| ================================== | 
 | RT-mutex subsystem with PI support | 
 | ================================== | 
 |  | 
 | RT-mutexes with priority inheritance are used to support PI-futexes, | 
 | which enable pthread_mutex_t priority inheritance attributes | 
 | (PTHREAD_PRIO_INHERIT). [See Documentation/locking/pi-futex.rst for more details | 
 | about PI-futexes.] | 
 |  | 
 | This technology was developed in the -rt tree and streamlined for | 
 | pthread_mutex support. | 
 |  | 
 | Basic principles: | 
 | ----------------- | 
 |  | 
 | RT-mutexes extend the semantics of simple mutexes by the priority | 
 | inheritance protocol. | 
 |  | 
 | A low priority owner of a rt-mutex inherits the priority of a higher | 
 | priority waiter until the rt-mutex is released. If the temporarily | 
 | boosted owner blocks on a rt-mutex itself it propagates the priority | 
 | boosting to the owner of the other rt_mutex it gets blocked on. The | 
 | priority boosting is immediately removed once the rt_mutex has been | 
 | unlocked. | 
 |  | 
 | This approach allows us to shorten the block of high-prio tasks on | 
 | mutexes which protect shared resources. Priority inheritance is not a | 
 | magic bullet for poorly designed applications, but it allows | 
 | well-designed applications to use userspace locks in critical parts of | 
 | an high priority thread, without losing determinism. | 
 |  | 
 | The enqueueing of the waiters into the rtmutex waiter tree is done in | 
 | priority order. For same priorities FIFO order is chosen. For each | 
 | rtmutex, only the top priority waiter is enqueued into the owner's | 
 | priority waiters tree. This tree too queues in priority order. Whenever | 
 | the top priority waiter of a task changes (for example it timed out or | 
 | got a signal), the priority of the owner task is readjusted. The | 
 | priority enqueueing is handled by "pi_waiters". | 
 |  | 
 | RT-mutexes are optimized for fastpath operations and have no internal | 
 | locking overhead when locking an uncontended mutex or unlocking a mutex | 
 | without waiters. The optimized fastpath operations require cmpxchg | 
 | support. [If that is not available then the rt-mutex internal spinlock | 
 | is used] | 
 |  | 
 | The state of the rt-mutex is tracked via the owner field of the rt-mutex | 
 | structure: | 
 |  | 
 | lock->owner holds the task_struct pointer of the owner. Bit 0 is used to | 
 | keep track of the "lock has waiters" state: | 
 |  | 
 |  ============ ======= ================================================ | 
 |  owner        bit0    Notes | 
 |  ============ ======= ================================================ | 
 |  NULL         0       lock is free (fast acquire possible) | 
 |  NULL         1       lock is free and has waiters and the top waiter | 
 | 		      is going to take the lock [1]_ | 
 |  taskpointer  0       lock is held (fast release possible) | 
 |  taskpointer  1       lock is held and has waiters [2]_ | 
 |  ============ ======= ================================================ | 
 |  | 
 | The fast atomic compare exchange based acquire and release is only | 
 | possible when bit 0 of lock->owner is 0. | 
 |  | 
 | .. [1] It also can be a transitional state when grabbing the lock | 
 |        with ->wait_lock is held. To prevent any fast path cmpxchg to the lock, | 
 |        we need to set the bit0 before looking at the lock, and the owner may | 
 |        be NULL in this small time, hence this can be a transitional state. | 
 |  | 
 | .. [2] There is a small time when bit 0 is set but there are no | 
 |        waiters. This can happen when grabbing the lock in the slow path. | 
 |        To prevent a cmpxchg of the owner releasing the lock, we need to | 
 |        set this bit before looking at the lock. | 
 |  | 
 | BTW, there is still technically a "Pending Owner", it's just not called | 
 | that anymore. The pending owner happens to be the top_waiter of a lock | 
 | that has no owner and has been woken up to grab the lock. |