| ======================= | |
| CPU cooling APIs How To | |
| ======================= | |
| Written by Amit Daniel Kachhap <amit.kachhap@linaro.org> | |
| Updated: 6 Jan 2015 | |
| Copyright (c) 2012 Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd(http://www.samsung.com) | |
| 0. Introduction | |
| =============== | |
| The generic cpu cooling(freq clipping) provides registration/unregistration APIs | |
| to the caller. The binding of the cooling devices to the trip point is left for | |
| the user. The registration APIs returns the cooling device pointer. | |
| 1. cpu cooling APIs | |
| =================== | |
| 1.1 cpufreq registration/unregistration APIs | |
| -------------------------------------------- | |
| :: | |
| struct thermal_cooling_device | |
| *cpufreq_cooling_register(struct cpumask *clip_cpus) | |
| This interface function registers the cpufreq cooling device with the name | |
| "thermal-cpufreq-%x". This api can support multiple instances of cpufreq | |
| cooling devices. | |
| clip_cpus: | |
| cpumask of cpus where the frequency constraints will happen. | |
| :: | |
| struct thermal_cooling_device | |
| *of_cpufreq_cooling_register(struct cpufreq_policy *policy) | |
| This interface function registers the cpufreq cooling device with | |
| the name "thermal-cpufreq-%x" linking it with a device tree node, in | |
| order to bind it via the thermal DT code. This api can support multiple | |
| instances of cpufreq cooling devices. | |
| policy: | |
| CPUFreq policy. | |
| :: | |
| void cpufreq_cooling_unregister(struct thermal_cooling_device *cdev) | |
| This interface function unregisters the "thermal-cpufreq-%x" cooling device. | |
| cdev: Cooling device pointer which has to be unregistered. | |
| 2. Power models | |
| =============== | |
| The power API registration functions provide a simple power model for | |
| CPUs. The current power is calculated as dynamic power (static power isn't | |
| supported currently). This power model requires that the operating-points of | |
| the CPUs are registered using the kernel's opp library and the | |
| `cpufreq_frequency_table` is assigned to the `struct device` of the | |
| cpu. If you are using CONFIG_CPUFREQ_DT then the | |
| `cpufreq_frequency_table` should already be assigned to the cpu | |
| device. | |
| The dynamic power consumption of a processor depends on many factors. | |
| For a given processor implementation the primary factors are: | |
| - The time the processor spends running, consuming dynamic power, as | |
| compared to the time in idle states where dynamic consumption is | |
| negligible. Herein we refer to this as 'utilisation'. | |
| - The voltage and frequency levels as a result of DVFS. The DVFS | |
| level is a dominant factor governing power consumption. | |
| - In running time the 'execution' behaviour (instruction types, memory | |
| access patterns and so forth) causes, in most cases, a second order | |
| variation. In pathological cases this variation can be significant, | |
| but typically it is of a much lesser impact than the factors above. | |
| A high level dynamic power consumption model may then be represented as:: | |
| Pdyn = f(run) * Voltage^2 * Frequency * Utilisation | |
| f(run) here represents the described execution behaviour and its | |
| result has a units of Watts/Hz/Volt^2 (this often expressed in | |
| mW/MHz/uVolt^2) | |
| The detailed behaviour for f(run) could be modelled on-line. However, | |
| in practice, such an on-line model has dependencies on a number of | |
| implementation specific processor support and characterisation | |
| factors. Therefore, in initial implementation that contribution is | |
| represented as a constant coefficient. This is a simplification | |
| consistent with the relative contribution to overall power variation. | |
| In this simplified representation our model becomes:: | |
| Pdyn = Capacitance * Voltage^2 * Frequency * Utilisation | |
| Where `capacitance` is a constant that represents an indicative | |
| running time dynamic power coefficient in fundamental units of | |
| mW/MHz/uVolt^2. Typical values for mobile CPUs might lie in range | |
| from 100 to 500. For reference, the approximate values for the SoC in | |
| ARM's Juno Development Platform are 530 for the Cortex-A57 cluster and | |
| 140 for the Cortex-A53 cluster. |