| .. _hugetlbfs_reserve: | 
 |  | 
 | ===================== | 
 | Hugetlbfs Reservation | 
 | ===================== | 
 |  | 
 | Overview | 
 | ======== | 
 |  | 
 | Huge pages as described at :ref:`hugetlbpage` are typically | 
 | preallocated for application use.  These huge pages are instantiated in a | 
 | task's address space at page fault time if the VMA indicates huge pages are | 
 | to be used.  If no huge page exists at page fault time, the task is sent | 
 | a SIGBUS and often dies an unhappy death.  Shortly after huge page support | 
 | was added, it was determined that it would be better to detect a shortage | 
 | of huge pages at mmap() time.  The idea is that if there were not enough | 
 | huge pages to cover the mapping, the mmap() would fail.  This was first | 
 | done with a simple check in the code at mmap() time to determine if there | 
 | were enough free huge pages to cover the mapping.  Like most things in the | 
 | kernel, the code has evolved over time.  However, the basic idea was to | 
 | 'reserve' huge pages at mmap() time to ensure that huge pages would be | 
 | available for page faults in that mapping.  The description below attempts to | 
 | describe how huge page reserve processing is done in the v4.10 kernel. | 
 |  | 
 |  | 
 | Audience | 
 | ======== | 
 | This description is primarily targeted at kernel developers who are modifying | 
 | hugetlbfs code. | 
 |  | 
 |  | 
 | The Data Structures | 
 | =================== | 
 |  | 
 | resv_huge_pages | 
 | 	This is a global (per-hstate) count of reserved huge pages.  Reserved | 
 | 	huge pages are only available to the task which reserved them. | 
 | 	Therefore, the number of huge pages generally available is computed | 
 | 	as (``free_huge_pages - resv_huge_pages``). | 
 | Reserve Map | 
 | 	A reserve map is described by the structure:: | 
 |  | 
 | 		struct resv_map { | 
 | 			struct kref refs; | 
 | 			spinlock_t lock; | 
 | 			struct list_head regions; | 
 | 			long adds_in_progress; | 
 | 			struct list_head region_cache; | 
 | 			long region_cache_count; | 
 | 		}; | 
 |  | 
 | 	There is one reserve map for each huge page mapping in the system. | 
 | 	The regions list within the resv_map describes the regions within | 
 | 	the mapping.  A region is described as:: | 
 |  | 
 | 		struct file_region { | 
 | 			struct list_head link; | 
 | 			long from; | 
 | 			long to; | 
 | 		}; | 
 |  | 
 | 	The 'from' and 'to' fields of the file region structure are huge page | 
 | 	indices into the mapping.  Depending on the type of mapping, a | 
 | 	region in the reserv_map may indicate reservations exist for the | 
 | 	range, or reservations do not exist. | 
 | Flags for MAP_PRIVATE Reservations | 
 | 	These are stored in the bottom bits of the reservation map pointer. | 
 |  | 
 | 	``#define HPAGE_RESV_OWNER    (1UL << 0)`` | 
 | 		Indicates this task is the owner of the reservations | 
 | 		associated with the mapping. | 
 | 	``#define HPAGE_RESV_UNMAPPED (1UL << 1)`` | 
 | 		Indicates task originally mapping this range (and creating | 
 | 		reserves) has unmapped a page from this task (the child) | 
 | 		due to a failed COW. | 
 | Page Flags | 
 | 	The PagePrivate page flag is used to indicate that a huge page | 
 | 	reservation must be restored when the huge page is freed.  More | 
 | 	details will be discussed in the "Freeing huge pages" section. | 
 |  | 
 |  | 
 | Reservation Map Location (Private or Shared) | 
 | ============================================ | 
 |  | 
 | A huge page mapping or segment is either private or shared.  If private, | 
 | it is typically only available to a single address space (task).  If shared, | 
 | it can be mapped into multiple address spaces (tasks).  The location and | 
 | semantics of the reservation map is significantly different for the two types | 
 | of mappings.  Location differences are: | 
 |  | 
 | - For private mappings, the reservation map hangs off the VMA structure. | 
 |   Specifically, vma->vm_private_data.  This reserve map is created at the | 
 |   time the mapping (mmap(MAP_PRIVATE)) is created. | 
 | - For shared mappings, the reservation map hangs off the inode.  Specifically, | 
 |   inode->i_mapping->private_data.  Since shared mappings are always backed | 
 |   by files in the hugetlbfs filesystem, the hugetlbfs code ensures each inode | 
 |   contains a reservation map.  As a result, the reservation map is allocated | 
 |   when the inode is created. | 
 |  | 
 |  | 
 | Creating Reservations | 
 | ===================== | 
 | Reservations are created when a huge page backed shared memory segment is | 
 | created (shmget(SHM_HUGETLB)) or a mapping is created via mmap(MAP_HUGETLB). | 
 | These operations result in a call to the routine hugetlb_reserve_pages():: | 
 |  | 
 | 	int hugetlb_reserve_pages(struct inode *inode, | 
 | 				  long from, long to, | 
 | 				  struct vm_area_struct *vma, | 
 | 				  vm_flags_t vm_flags) | 
 |  | 
 | The first thing hugetlb_reserve_pages() does is check if the NORESERVE | 
 | flag was specified in either the shmget() or mmap() call.  If NORESERVE | 
 | was specified, then this routine returns immediately as no reservations | 
 | are desired. | 
 |  | 
 | The arguments 'from' and 'to' are huge page indices into the mapping or | 
 | underlying file.  For shmget(), 'from' is always 0 and 'to' corresponds to | 
 | the length of the segment/mapping.  For mmap(), the offset argument could | 
 | be used to specify the offset into the underlying file.  In such a case, | 
 | the 'from' and 'to' arguments have been adjusted by this offset. | 
 |  | 
 | One of the big differences between PRIVATE and SHARED mappings is the way | 
 | in which reservations are represented in the reservation map. | 
 |  | 
 | - For shared mappings, an entry in the reservation map indicates a reservation | 
 |   exists or did exist for the corresponding page.  As reservations are | 
 |   consumed, the reservation map is not modified. | 
 | - For private mappings, the lack of an entry in the reservation map indicates | 
 |   a reservation exists for the corresponding page.  As reservations are | 
 |   consumed, entries are added to the reservation map.  Therefore, the | 
 |   reservation map can also be used to determine which reservations have | 
 |   been consumed. | 
 |  | 
 | For private mappings, hugetlb_reserve_pages() creates the reservation map and | 
 | hangs it off the VMA structure.  In addition, the HPAGE_RESV_OWNER flag is set | 
 | to indicate this VMA owns the reservations. | 
 |  | 
 | The reservation map is consulted to determine how many huge page reservations | 
 | are needed for the current mapping/segment.  For private mappings, this is | 
 | always the value (to - from).  However, for shared mappings it is possible that | 
 | some reservations may already exist within the range (to - from).  See the | 
 | section :ref:`Reservation Map Modifications <resv_map_modifications>` | 
 | for details on how this is accomplished. | 
 |  | 
 | The mapping may be associated with a subpool.  If so, the subpool is consulted | 
 | to ensure there is sufficient space for the mapping.  It is possible that the | 
 | subpool has set aside reservations that can be used for the mapping.  See the | 
 | section :ref:`Subpool Reservations <sub_pool_resv>` for more details. | 
 |  | 
 | After consulting the reservation map and subpool, the number of needed new | 
 | reservations is known.  The routine hugetlb_acct_memory() is called to check | 
 | for and take the requested number of reservations.  hugetlb_acct_memory() | 
 | calls into routines that potentially allocate and adjust surplus page counts. | 
 | However, within those routines the code is simply checking to ensure there | 
 | are enough free huge pages to accommodate the reservation.  If there are, | 
 | the global reservation count resv_huge_pages is adjusted something like the | 
 | following:: | 
 |  | 
 | 	if (resv_needed <= (resv_huge_pages - free_huge_pages)) | 
 | 		resv_huge_pages += resv_needed; | 
 |  | 
 | Note that the global lock hugetlb_lock is held when checking and adjusting | 
 | these counters. | 
 |  | 
 | If there were enough free huge pages and the global count resv_huge_pages | 
 | was adjusted, then the reservation map associated with the mapping is | 
 | modified to reflect the reservations.  In the case of a shared mapping, a | 
 | file_region will exist that includes the range 'from' - 'to'.  For private | 
 | mappings, no modifications are made to the reservation map as lack of an | 
 | entry indicates a reservation exists. | 
 |  | 
 | If hugetlb_reserve_pages() was successful, the global reservation count and | 
 | reservation map associated with the mapping will be modified as required to | 
 | ensure reservations exist for the range 'from' - 'to'. | 
 |  | 
 | .. _consume_resv: | 
 |  | 
 | Consuming Reservations/Allocating a Huge Page | 
 | ============================================= | 
 |  | 
 | Reservations are consumed when huge pages associated with the reservations | 
 | are allocated and instantiated in the corresponding mapping.  The allocation | 
 | is performed within the routine alloc_huge_page():: | 
 |  | 
 | 	struct page *alloc_huge_page(struct vm_area_struct *vma, | 
 | 				     unsigned long addr, int avoid_reserve) | 
 |  | 
 | alloc_huge_page is passed a VMA pointer and a virtual address, so it can | 
 | consult the reservation map to determine if a reservation exists.  In addition, | 
 | alloc_huge_page takes the argument avoid_reserve which indicates reserves | 
 | should not be used even if it appears they have been set aside for the | 
 | specified address.  The avoid_reserve argument is most often used in the case | 
 | of Copy on Write and Page Migration where additional copies of an existing | 
 | page are being allocated. | 
 |  | 
 | The helper routine vma_needs_reservation() is called to determine if a | 
 | reservation exists for the address within the mapping(vma).  See the section | 
 | :ref:`Reservation Map Helper Routines <resv_map_helpers>` for detailed | 
 | information on what this routine does. | 
 | The value returned from vma_needs_reservation() is generally | 
 | 0 or 1.  0 if a reservation exists for the address, 1 if no reservation exists. | 
 | If a reservation does not exist, and there is a subpool associated with the | 
 | mapping the subpool is consulted to determine if it contains reservations. | 
 | If the subpool contains reservations, one can be used for this allocation. | 
 | However, in every case the avoid_reserve argument overrides the use of | 
 | a reservation for the allocation.  After determining whether a reservation | 
 | exists and can be used for the allocation, the routine dequeue_huge_page_vma() | 
 | is called.  This routine takes two arguments related to reservations: | 
 |  | 
 | - avoid_reserve, this is the same value/argument passed to alloc_huge_page() | 
 | - chg, even though this argument is of type long only the values 0 or 1 are | 
 |   passed to dequeue_huge_page_vma.  If the value is 0, it indicates a | 
 |   reservation exists (see the section "Memory Policy and Reservations" for | 
 |   possible issues).  If the value is 1, it indicates a reservation does not | 
 |   exist and the page must be taken from the global free pool if possible. | 
 |  | 
 | The free lists associated with the memory policy of the VMA are searched for | 
 | a free page.  If a page is found, the value free_huge_pages is decremented | 
 | when the page is removed from the free list.  If there was a reservation | 
 | associated with the page, the following adjustments are made:: | 
 |  | 
 | 	SetPagePrivate(page);	/* Indicates allocating this page consumed | 
 | 				 * a reservation, and if an error is | 
 | 				 * encountered such that the page must be | 
 | 				 * freed, the reservation will be restored. */ | 
 | 	resv_huge_pages--;	/* Decrement the global reservation count */ | 
 |  | 
 | Note, if no huge page can be found that satisfies the VMA's memory policy | 
 | an attempt will be made to allocate one using the buddy allocator.  This | 
 | brings up the issue of surplus huge pages and overcommit which is beyond | 
 | the scope reservations.  Even if a surplus page is allocated, the same | 
 | reservation based adjustments as above will be made: SetPagePrivate(page) and | 
 | resv_huge_pages--. | 
 |  | 
 | After obtaining a new huge page, (page)->private is set to the value of | 
 | the subpool associated with the page if it exists.  This will be used for | 
 | subpool accounting when the page is freed. | 
 |  | 
 | The routine vma_commit_reservation() is then called to adjust the reserve | 
 | map based on the consumption of the reservation.  In general, this involves | 
 | ensuring the page is represented within a file_region structure of the region | 
 | map.  For shared mappings where the reservation was present, an entry | 
 | in the reserve map already existed so no change is made.  However, if there | 
 | was no reservation in a shared mapping or this was a private mapping a new | 
 | entry must be created. | 
 |  | 
 | It is possible that the reserve map could have been changed between the call | 
 | to vma_needs_reservation() at the beginning of alloc_huge_page() and the | 
 | call to vma_commit_reservation() after the page was allocated.  This would | 
 | be possible if hugetlb_reserve_pages was called for the same page in a shared | 
 | mapping.  In such cases, the reservation count and subpool free page count | 
 | will be off by one.  This rare condition can be identified by comparing the | 
 | return value from vma_needs_reservation and vma_commit_reservation.  If such | 
 | a race is detected, the subpool and global reserve counts are adjusted to | 
 | compensate.  See the section | 
 | :ref:`Reservation Map Helper Routines <resv_map_helpers>` for more | 
 | information on these routines. | 
 |  | 
 |  | 
 | Instantiate Huge Pages | 
 | ====================== | 
 |  | 
 | After huge page allocation, the page is typically added to the page tables | 
 | of the allocating task.  Before this, pages in a shared mapping are added | 
 | to the page cache and pages in private mappings are added to an anonymous | 
 | reverse mapping.  In both cases, the PagePrivate flag is cleared.  Therefore, | 
 | when a huge page that has been instantiated is freed no adjustment is made | 
 | to the global reservation count (resv_huge_pages). | 
 |  | 
 |  | 
 | Freeing Huge Pages | 
 | ================== | 
 |  | 
 | Huge page freeing is performed by the routine free_huge_page().  This routine | 
 | is the destructor for hugetlbfs compound pages.  As a result, it is only | 
 | passed a pointer to the page struct.  When a huge page is freed, reservation | 
 | accounting may need to be performed.  This would be the case if the page was | 
 | associated with a subpool that contained reserves, or the page is being freed | 
 | on an error path where a global reserve count must be restored. | 
 |  | 
 | The page->private field points to any subpool associated with the page. | 
 | If the PagePrivate flag is set, it indicates the global reserve count should | 
 | be adjusted (see the section | 
 | :ref:`Consuming Reservations/Allocating a Huge Page <consume_resv>` | 
 | for information on how these are set). | 
 |  | 
 | The routine first calls hugepage_subpool_put_pages() for the page.  If this | 
 | routine returns a value of 0 (which does not equal the value passed 1) it | 
 | indicates reserves are associated with the subpool, and this newly free page | 
 | must be used to keep the number of subpool reserves above the minimum size. | 
 | Therefore, the global resv_huge_pages counter is incremented in this case. | 
 |  | 
 | If the PagePrivate flag was set in the page, the global resv_huge_pages counter | 
 | will always be incremented. | 
 |  | 
 | .. _sub_pool_resv: | 
 |  | 
 | Subpool Reservations | 
 | ==================== | 
 |  | 
 | There is a struct hstate associated with each huge page size.  The hstate | 
 | tracks all huge pages of the specified size.  A subpool represents a subset | 
 | of pages within a hstate that is associated with a mounted hugetlbfs | 
 | filesystem. | 
 |  | 
 | When a hugetlbfs filesystem is mounted a min_size option can be specified | 
 | which indicates the minimum number of huge pages required by the filesystem. | 
 | If this option is specified, the number of huge pages corresponding to | 
 | min_size are reserved for use by the filesystem.  This number is tracked in | 
 | the min_hpages field of a struct hugepage_subpool.  At mount time, | 
 | hugetlb_acct_memory(min_hpages) is called to reserve the specified number of | 
 | huge pages.  If they can not be reserved, the mount fails. | 
 |  | 
 | The routines hugepage_subpool_get/put_pages() are called when pages are | 
 | obtained from or released back to a subpool.  They perform all subpool | 
 | accounting, and track any reservations associated with the subpool. | 
 | hugepage_subpool_get/put_pages are passed the number of huge pages by which | 
 | to adjust the subpool 'used page' count (down for get, up for put).  Normally, | 
 | they return the same value that was passed or an error if not enough pages | 
 | exist in the subpool. | 
 |  | 
 | However, if reserves are associated with the subpool a return value less | 
 | than the passed value may be returned.  This return value indicates the | 
 | number of additional global pool adjustments which must be made.  For example, | 
 | suppose a subpool contains 3 reserved huge pages and someone asks for 5. | 
 | The 3 reserved pages associated with the subpool can be used to satisfy part | 
 | of the request.  But, 2 pages must be obtained from the global pools.  To | 
 | relay this information to the caller, the value 2 is returned.  The caller | 
 | is then responsible for attempting to obtain the additional two pages from | 
 | the global pools. | 
 |  | 
 |  | 
 | COW and Reservations | 
 | ==================== | 
 |  | 
 | Since shared mappings all point to and use the same underlying pages, the | 
 | biggest reservation concern for COW is private mappings.  In this case, | 
 | two tasks can be pointing at the same previously allocated page.  One task | 
 | attempts to write to the page, so a new page must be allocated so that each | 
 | task points to its own page. | 
 |  | 
 | When the page was originally allocated, the reservation for that page was | 
 | consumed.  When an attempt to allocate a new page is made as a result of | 
 | COW, it is possible that no free huge pages are free and the allocation | 
 | will fail. | 
 |  | 
 | When the private mapping was originally created, the owner of the mapping | 
 | was noted by setting the HPAGE_RESV_OWNER bit in the pointer to the reservation | 
 | map of the owner.  Since the owner created the mapping, the owner owns all | 
 | the reservations associated with the mapping.  Therefore, when a write fault | 
 | occurs and there is no page available, different action is taken for the owner | 
 | and non-owner of the reservation. | 
 |  | 
 | In the case where the faulting task is not the owner, the fault will fail and | 
 | the task will typically receive a SIGBUS. | 
 |  | 
 | If the owner is the faulting task, we want it to succeed since it owned the | 
 | original reservation.  To accomplish this, the page is unmapped from the | 
 | non-owning task.  In this way, the only reference is from the owning task. | 
 | In addition, the HPAGE_RESV_UNMAPPED bit is set in the reservation map pointer | 
 | of the non-owning task.  The non-owning task may receive a SIGBUS if it later | 
 | faults on a non-present page.  But, the original owner of the | 
 | mapping/reservation will behave as expected. | 
 |  | 
 |  | 
 | .. _resv_map_modifications: | 
 |  | 
 | Reservation Map Modifications | 
 | ============================= | 
 |  | 
 | The following low level routines are used to make modifications to a | 
 | reservation map.  Typically, these routines are not called directly.  Rather, | 
 | a reservation map helper routine is called which calls one of these low level | 
 | routines.  These low level routines are fairly well documented in the source | 
 | code (mm/hugetlb.c).  These routines are:: | 
 |  | 
 | 	long region_chg(struct resv_map *resv, long f, long t); | 
 | 	long region_add(struct resv_map *resv, long f, long t); | 
 | 	void region_abort(struct resv_map *resv, long f, long t); | 
 | 	long region_count(struct resv_map *resv, long f, long t); | 
 |  | 
 | Operations on the reservation map typically involve two operations: | 
 |  | 
 | 1) region_chg() is called to examine the reserve map and determine how | 
 |    many pages in the specified range [f, t) are NOT currently represented. | 
 |  | 
 |    The calling code performs global checks and allocations to determine if | 
 |    there are enough huge pages for the operation to succeed. | 
 |  | 
 | 2) | 
 |   a) If the operation can succeed, region_add() is called to actually modify | 
 |      the reservation map for the same range [f, t) previously passed to | 
 |      region_chg(). | 
 |   b) If the operation can not succeed, region_abort is called for the same | 
 |      range [f, t) to abort the operation. | 
 |  | 
 | Note that this is a two step process where region_add() and region_abort() | 
 | are guaranteed to succeed after a prior call to region_chg() for the same | 
 | range.  region_chg() is responsible for pre-allocating any data structures | 
 | necessary to ensure the subsequent operations (specifically region_add())) | 
 | will succeed. | 
 |  | 
 | As mentioned above, region_chg() determines the number of pages in the range | 
 | which are NOT currently represented in the map.  This number is returned to | 
 | the caller.  region_add() returns the number of pages in the range added to | 
 | the map.  In most cases, the return value of region_add() is the same as the | 
 | return value of region_chg().  However, in the case of shared mappings it is | 
 | possible for changes to the reservation map to be made between the calls to | 
 | region_chg() and region_add().  In this case, the return value of region_add() | 
 | will not match the return value of region_chg().  It is likely that in such | 
 | cases global counts and subpool accounting will be incorrect and in need of | 
 | adjustment.  It is the responsibility of the caller to check for this condition | 
 | and make the appropriate adjustments. | 
 |  | 
 | The routine region_del() is called to remove regions from a reservation map. | 
 | It is typically called in the following situations: | 
 |  | 
 | - When a file in the hugetlbfs filesystem is being removed, the inode will | 
 |   be released and the reservation map freed.  Before freeing the reservation | 
 |   map, all the individual file_region structures must be freed.  In this case | 
 |   region_del is passed the range [0, LONG_MAX). | 
 | - When a hugetlbfs file is being truncated.  In this case, all allocated pages | 
 |   after the new file size must be freed.  In addition, any file_region entries | 
 |   in the reservation map past the new end of file must be deleted.  In this | 
 |   case, region_del is passed the range [new_end_of_file, LONG_MAX). | 
 | - When a hole is being punched in a hugetlbfs file.  In this case, huge pages | 
 |   are removed from the middle of the file one at a time.  As the pages are | 
 |   removed, region_del() is called to remove the corresponding entry from the | 
 |   reservation map.  In this case, region_del is passed the range | 
 |   [page_idx, page_idx + 1). | 
 |  | 
 | In every case, region_del() will return the number of pages removed from the | 
 | reservation map.  In VERY rare cases, region_del() can fail.  This can only | 
 | happen in the hole punch case where it has to split an existing file_region | 
 | entry and can not allocate a new structure.  In this error case, region_del() | 
 | will return -ENOMEM.  The problem here is that the reservation map will | 
 | indicate that there is a reservation for the page.  However, the subpool and | 
 | global reservation counts will not reflect the reservation.  To handle this | 
 | situation, the routine hugetlb_fix_reserve_counts() is called to adjust the | 
 | counters so that they correspond with the reservation map entry that could | 
 | not be deleted. | 
 |  | 
 | region_count() is called when unmapping a private huge page mapping.  In | 
 | private mappings, the lack of a entry in the reservation map indicates that | 
 | a reservation exists.  Therefore, by counting the number of entries in the | 
 | reservation map we know how many reservations were consumed and how many are | 
 | outstanding (outstanding = (end - start) - region_count(resv, start, end)). | 
 | Since the mapping is going away, the subpool and global reservation counts | 
 | are decremented by the number of outstanding reservations. | 
 |  | 
 | .. _resv_map_helpers: | 
 |  | 
 | Reservation Map Helper Routines | 
 | =============================== | 
 |  | 
 | Several helper routines exist to query and modify the reservation maps. | 
 | These routines are only interested with reservations for a specific huge | 
 | page, so they just pass in an address instead of a range.  In addition, | 
 | they pass in the associated VMA.  From the VMA, the type of mapping (private | 
 | or shared) and the location of the reservation map (inode or VMA) can be | 
 | determined.  These routines simply call the underlying routines described | 
 | in the section "Reservation Map Modifications".  However, they do take into | 
 | account the 'opposite' meaning of reservation map entries for private and | 
 | shared mappings and hide this detail from the caller:: | 
 |  | 
 | 	long vma_needs_reservation(struct hstate *h, | 
 | 				   struct vm_area_struct *vma, | 
 | 				   unsigned long addr) | 
 |  | 
 | This routine calls region_chg() for the specified page.  If no reservation | 
 | exists, 1 is returned.  If a reservation exists, 0 is returned:: | 
 |  | 
 | 	long vma_commit_reservation(struct hstate *h, | 
 | 				    struct vm_area_struct *vma, | 
 | 				    unsigned long addr) | 
 |  | 
 | This calls region_add() for the specified page.  As in the case of region_chg | 
 | and region_add, this routine is to be called after a previous call to | 
 | vma_needs_reservation.  It will add a reservation entry for the page.  It | 
 | returns 1 if the reservation was added and 0 if not.  The return value should | 
 | be compared with the return value of the previous call to | 
 | vma_needs_reservation.  An unexpected difference indicates the reservation | 
 | map was modified between calls:: | 
 |  | 
 | 	void vma_end_reservation(struct hstate *h, | 
 | 				 struct vm_area_struct *vma, | 
 | 				 unsigned long addr) | 
 |  | 
 | This calls region_abort() for the specified page.  As in the case of region_chg | 
 | and region_abort, this routine is to be called after a previous call to | 
 | vma_needs_reservation.  It will abort/end the in progress reservation add | 
 | operation:: | 
 |  | 
 | 	long vma_add_reservation(struct hstate *h, | 
 | 				 struct vm_area_struct *vma, | 
 | 				 unsigned long addr) | 
 |  | 
 | This is a special wrapper routine to help facilitate reservation cleanup | 
 | on error paths.  It is only called from the routine restore_reserve_on_error(). | 
 | This routine is used in conjunction with vma_needs_reservation in an attempt | 
 | to add a reservation to the reservation map.  It takes into account the | 
 | different reservation map semantics for private and shared mappings.  Hence, | 
 | region_add is called for shared mappings (as an entry present in the map | 
 | indicates a reservation), and region_del is called for private mappings (as | 
 | the absence of an entry in the map indicates a reservation).  See the section | 
 | "Reservation cleanup in error paths" for more information on what needs to | 
 | be done on error paths. | 
 |  | 
 |  | 
 | Reservation Cleanup in Error Paths | 
 | ================================== | 
 |  | 
 | As mentioned in the section | 
 | :ref:`Reservation Map Helper Routines <resv_map_helpers>`, reservation | 
 | map modifications are performed in two steps.  First vma_needs_reservation | 
 | is called before a page is allocated.  If the allocation is successful, | 
 | then vma_commit_reservation is called.  If not, vma_end_reservation is called. | 
 | Global and subpool reservation counts are adjusted based on success or failure | 
 | of the operation and all is well. | 
 |  | 
 | Additionally, after a huge page is instantiated the PagePrivate flag is | 
 | cleared so that accounting when the page is ultimately freed is correct. | 
 |  | 
 | However, there are several instances where errors are encountered after a huge | 
 | page is allocated but before it is instantiated.  In this case, the page | 
 | allocation has consumed the reservation and made the appropriate subpool, | 
 | reservation map and global count adjustments.  If the page is freed at this | 
 | time (before instantiation and clearing of PagePrivate), then free_huge_page | 
 | will increment the global reservation count.  However, the reservation map | 
 | indicates the reservation was consumed.  This resulting inconsistent state | 
 | will cause the 'leak' of a reserved huge page.  The global reserve count will | 
 | be  higher than it should and prevent allocation of a pre-allocated page. | 
 |  | 
 | The routine restore_reserve_on_error() attempts to handle this situation.  It | 
 | is fairly well documented.  The intention of this routine is to restore | 
 | the reservation map to the way it was before the page allocation.   In this | 
 | way, the state of the reservation map will correspond to the global reservation | 
 | count after the page is freed. | 
 |  | 
 | The routine restore_reserve_on_error itself may encounter errors while | 
 | attempting to restore the reservation map entry.  In this case, it will | 
 | simply clear the PagePrivate flag of the page.  In this way, the global | 
 | reserve count will not be incremented when the page is freed.  However, the | 
 | reservation map will continue to look as though the reservation was consumed. | 
 | A page can still be allocated for the address, but it will not use a reserved | 
 | page as originally intended. | 
 |  | 
 | There is some code (most notably userfaultfd) which can not call | 
 | restore_reserve_on_error.  In this case, it simply modifies the PagePrivate | 
 | so that a reservation will not be leaked when the huge page is freed. | 
 |  | 
 |  | 
 | Reservations and Memory Policy | 
 | ============================== | 
 | Per-node huge page lists existed in struct hstate when git was first used | 
 | to manage Linux code.  The concept of reservations was added some time later. | 
 | When reservations were added, no attempt was made to take memory policy | 
 | into account.  While cpusets are not exactly the same as memory policy, this | 
 | comment in hugetlb_acct_memory sums up the interaction between reservations | 
 | and cpusets/memory policy:: | 
 |  | 
 | 	/* | 
 | 	 * When cpuset is configured, it breaks the strict hugetlb page | 
 | 	 * reservation as the accounting is done on a global variable. Such | 
 | 	 * reservation is completely rubbish in the presence of cpuset because | 
 | 	 * the reservation is not checked against page availability for the | 
 | 	 * current cpuset. Application can still potentially OOM'ed by kernel | 
 | 	 * with lack of free htlb page in cpuset that the task is in. | 
 | 	 * Attempt to enforce strict accounting with cpuset is almost | 
 | 	 * impossible (or too ugly) because cpuset is too fluid that | 
 | 	 * task or memory node can be dynamically moved between cpusets. | 
 | 	 * | 
 | 	 * The change of semantics for shared hugetlb mapping with cpuset is | 
 | 	 * undesirable. However, in order to preserve some of the semantics, | 
 | 	 * we fall back to check against current free page availability as | 
 | 	 * a best attempt and hopefully to minimize the impact of changing | 
 | 	 * semantics that cpuset has. | 
 | 	 */ | 
 |  | 
 | Huge page reservations were added to prevent unexpected page allocation | 
 | failures (OOM) at page fault time.  However, if an application makes use | 
 | of cpusets or memory policy there is no guarantee that huge pages will be | 
 | available on the required nodes.  This is true even if there are a sufficient | 
 | number of global reservations. | 
 |  | 
 | Hugetlbfs regression testing | 
 | ============================ | 
 |  | 
 | The most complete set of hugetlb tests are in the libhugetlbfs repository. | 
 | If you modify any hugetlb related code, use the libhugetlbfs test suite | 
 | to check for regressions.  In addition, if you add any new hugetlb | 
 | functionality, please add appropriate tests to libhugetlbfs. | 
 |  | 
 | -- | 
 | Mike Kravetz, 7 April 2017 |