| ============ | 
 | SNMP counter | 
 | ============ | 
 |  | 
 | This document explains the meaning of SNMP counters. | 
 |  | 
 | General IPv4 counters | 
 | ===================== | 
 | All layer 4 packets and ICMP packets will change these counters, but | 
 | these counters won't be changed by layer 2 packets (such as STP) or | 
 | ARP packets. | 
 |  | 
 | * IpInReceives | 
 |  | 
 | Defined in `RFC1213 ipInReceives`_ | 
 |  | 
 | .. _RFC1213 ipInReceives: https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc1213#page-26 | 
 |  | 
 | The number of packets received by the IP layer. It gets increasing at the | 
 | beginning of ip_rcv function, always be updated together with | 
 | IpExtInOctets. It will be increased even if the packet is dropped | 
 | later (e.g. due to the IP header is invalid or the checksum is wrong | 
 | and so on).  It indicates the number of aggregated segments after | 
 | GRO/LRO. | 
 |  | 
 | * IpInDelivers | 
 |  | 
 | Defined in `RFC1213 ipInDelivers`_ | 
 |  | 
 | .. _RFC1213 ipInDelivers: https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc1213#page-28 | 
 |  | 
 | The number of packets delivers to the upper layer protocols. E.g. TCP, UDP, | 
 | ICMP and so on. If no one listens on a raw socket, only kernel | 
 | supported protocols will be delivered, if someone listens on the raw | 
 | socket, all valid IP packets will be delivered. | 
 |  | 
 | * IpOutRequests | 
 |  | 
 | Defined in `RFC1213 ipOutRequests`_ | 
 |  | 
 | .. _RFC1213 ipOutRequests: https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc1213#page-28 | 
 |  | 
 | The number of packets sent via IP layer, for both single cast and | 
 | multicast packets, and would always be updated together with | 
 | IpExtOutOctets. | 
 |  | 
 | * IpExtInOctets and IpExtOutOctets | 
 |  | 
 | They are Linux kernel extensions, no RFC definitions. Please note, | 
 | RFC1213 indeed defines ifInOctets  and ifOutOctets, but they | 
 | are different things. The ifInOctets and ifOutOctets include the MAC | 
 | layer header size but IpExtInOctets and IpExtOutOctets don't, they | 
 | only include the IP layer header and the IP layer data. | 
 |  | 
 | * IpExtInNoECTPkts, IpExtInECT1Pkts, IpExtInECT0Pkts, IpExtInCEPkts | 
 |  | 
 | They indicate the number of four kinds of ECN IP packets, please refer | 
 | `Explicit Congestion Notification`_ for more details. | 
 |  | 
 | .. _Explicit Congestion Notification: https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc3168#page-6 | 
 |  | 
 | These 4 counters calculate how many packets received per ECN | 
 | status. They count the real frame number regardless the LRO/GRO. So | 
 | for the same packet, you might find that IpInReceives count 1, but | 
 | IpExtInNoECTPkts counts 2 or more. | 
 |  | 
 | * IpInHdrErrors | 
 |  | 
 | Defined in `RFC1213 ipInHdrErrors`_. It indicates the packet is | 
 | dropped due to the IP header error. It might happen in both IP input | 
 | and IP forward paths. | 
 |  | 
 | .. _RFC1213 ipInHdrErrors: https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc1213#page-27 | 
 |  | 
 | * IpInAddrErrors | 
 |  | 
 | Defined in `RFC1213 ipInAddrErrors`_. It will be increased in two | 
 | scenarios: (1) The IP address is invalid. (2) The destination IP | 
 | address is not a local address and IP forwarding is not enabled | 
 |  | 
 | .. _RFC1213 ipInAddrErrors: https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc1213#page-27 | 
 |  | 
 | * IpExtInNoRoutes | 
 |  | 
 | This counter means the packet is dropped when the IP stack receives a | 
 | packet and can't find a route for it from the route table. It might | 
 | happen when IP forwarding is enabled and the destination IP address is | 
 | not a local address and there is no route for the destination IP | 
 | address. | 
 |  | 
 | * IpInUnknownProtos | 
 |  | 
 | Defined in `RFC1213 ipInUnknownProtos`_. It will be increased if the | 
 | layer 4 protocol is unsupported by kernel. If an application is using | 
 | raw socket, kernel will always deliver the packet to the raw socket | 
 | and this counter won't be increased. | 
 |  | 
 | .. _RFC1213 ipInUnknownProtos: https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc1213#page-27 | 
 |  | 
 | * IpExtInTruncatedPkts | 
 |  | 
 | For IPv4 packet, it means the actual data size is smaller than the | 
 | "Total Length" field in the IPv4 header. | 
 |  | 
 | * IpInDiscards | 
 |  | 
 | Defined in `RFC1213 ipInDiscards`_. It indicates the packet is dropped | 
 | in the IP receiving path and due to kernel internal reasons (e.g. no | 
 | enough memory). | 
 |  | 
 | .. _RFC1213 ipInDiscards: https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc1213#page-28 | 
 |  | 
 | * IpOutDiscards | 
 |  | 
 | Defined in `RFC1213 ipOutDiscards`_. It indicates the packet is | 
 | dropped in the IP sending path and due to kernel internal reasons. | 
 |  | 
 | .. _RFC1213 ipOutDiscards: https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc1213#page-28 | 
 |  | 
 | * IpOutNoRoutes | 
 |  | 
 | Defined in `RFC1213 ipOutNoRoutes`_. It indicates the packet is | 
 | dropped in the IP sending path and no route is found for it. | 
 |  | 
 | .. _RFC1213 ipOutNoRoutes: https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc1213#page-29 | 
 |  | 
 | ICMP counters | 
 | ============= | 
 | * IcmpInMsgs and IcmpOutMsgs | 
 |  | 
 | Defined by `RFC1213 icmpInMsgs`_ and `RFC1213 icmpOutMsgs`_ | 
 |  | 
 | .. _RFC1213 icmpInMsgs: https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc1213#page-41 | 
 | .. _RFC1213 icmpOutMsgs: https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc1213#page-43 | 
 |  | 
 | As mentioned in the RFC1213, these two counters include errors, they | 
 | would be increased even if the ICMP packet has an invalid type. The | 
 | ICMP output path will check the header of a raw socket, so the | 
 | IcmpOutMsgs would still be updated if the IP header is constructed by | 
 | a userspace program. | 
 |  | 
 | * ICMP named types | 
 |  | 
 | | These counters include most of common ICMP types, they are: | 
 | | IcmpInDestUnreachs: `RFC1213 icmpInDestUnreachs`_ | 
 | | IcmpInTimeExcds: `RFC1213 icmpInTimeExcds`_ | 
 | | IcmpInParmProbs: `RFC1213 icmpInParmProbs`_ | 
 | | IcmpInSrcQuenchs: `RFC1213 icmpInSrcQuenchs`_ | 
 | | IcmpInRedirects: `RFC1213 icmpInRedirects`_ | 
 | | IcmpInEchos: `RFC1213 icmpInEchos`_ | 
 | | IcmpInEchoReps: `RFC1213 icmpInEchoReps`_ | 
 | | IcmpInTimestamps: `RFC1213 icmpInTimestamps`_ | 
 | | IcmpInTimestampReps: `RFC1213 icmpInTimestampReps`_ | 
 | | IcmpInAddrMasks: `RFC1213 icmpInAddrMasks`_ | 
 | | IcmpInAddrMaskReps: `RFC1213 icmpInAddrMaskReps`_ | 
 | | IcmpOutDestUnreachs: `RFC1213 icmpOutDestUnreachs`_ | 
 | | IcmpOutTimeExcds: `RFC1213 icmpOutTimeExcds`_ | 
 | | IcmpOutParmProbs: `RFC1213 icmpOutParmProbs`_ | 
 | | IcmpOutSrcQuenchs: `RFC1213 icmpOutSrcQuenchs`_ | 
 | | IcmpOutRedirects: `RFC1213 icmpOutRedirects`_ | 
 | | IcmpOutEchos: `RFC1213 icmpOutEchos`_ | 
 | | IcmpOutEchoReps: `RFC1213 icmpOutEchoReps`_ | 
 | | IcmpOutTimestamps: `RFC1213 icmpOutTimestamps`_ | 
 | | IcmpOutTimestampReps: `RFC1213 icmpOutTimestampReps`_ | 
 | | IcmpOutAddrMasks: `RFC1213 icmpOutAddrMasks`_ | 
 | | IcmpOutAddrMaskReps: `RFC1213 icmpOutAddrMaskReps`_ | 
 |  | 
 | .. _RFC1213 icmpInDestUnreachs: https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc1213#page-41 | 
 | .. _RFC1213 icmpInTimeExcds: https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc1213#page-41 | 
 | .. _RFC1213 icmpInParmProbs: https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc1213#page-42 | 
 | .. _RFC1213 icmpInSrcQuenchs: https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc1213#page-42 | 
 | .. _RFC1213 icmpInRedirects: https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc1213#page-42 | 
 | .. _RFC1213 icmpInEchos: https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc1213#page-42 | 
 | .. _RFC1213 icmpInEchoReps: https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc1213#page-42 | 
 | .. _RFC1213 icmpInTimestamps: https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc1213#page-42 | 
 | .. _RFC1213 icmpInTimestampReps: https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc1213#page-43 | 
 | .. _RFC1213 icmpInAddrMasks: https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc1213#page-43 | 
 | .. _RFC1213 icmpInAddrMaskReps: https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc1213#page-43 | 
 |  | 
 | .. _RFC1213 icmpOutDestUnreachs: https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc1213#page-44 | 
 | .. _RFC1213 icmpOutTimeExcds: https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc1213#page-44 | 
 | .. _RFC1213 icmpOutParmProbs: https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc1213#page-44 | 
 | .. _RFC1213 icmpOutSrcQuenchs: https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc1213#page-44 | 
 | .. _RFC1213 icmpOutRedirects: https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc1213#page-44 | 
 | .. _RFC1213 icmpOutEchos: https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc1213#page-45 | 
 | .. _RFC1213 icmpOutEchoReps: https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc1213#page-45 | 
 | .. _RFC1213 icmpOutTimestamps: https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc1213#page-45 | 
 | .. _RFC1213 icmpOutTimestampReps: https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc1213#page-45 | 
 | .. _RFC1213 icmpOutAddrMasks: https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc1213#page-45 | 
 | .. _RFC1213 icmpOutAddrMaskReps: https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc1213#page-46 | 
 |  | 
 | Every ICMP type has two counters: 'In' and 'Out'. E.g., for the ICMP | 
 | Echo packet, they are IcmpInEchos and IcmpOutEchos. Their meanings are | 
 | straightforward. The 'In' counter means kernel receives such a packet | 
 | and the 'Out' counter means kernel sends such a packet. | 
 |  | 
 | * ICMP numeric types | 
 |  | 
 | They are IcmpMsgInType[N] and IcmpMsgOutType[N], the [N] indicates the | 
 | ICMP type number. These counters track all kinds of ICMP packets. The | 
 | ICMP type number definition could be found in the `ICMP parameters`_ | 
 | document. | 
 |  | 
 | .. _ICMP parameters: https://www.iana.org/assignments/icmp-parameters/icmp-parameters.xhtml | 
 |  | 
 | For example, if the Linux kernel sends an ICMP Echo packet, the | 
 | IcmpMsgOutType8 would increase 1. And if kernel gets an ICMP Echo Reply | 
 | packet, IcmpMsgInType0 would increase 1. | 
 |  | 
 | * IcmpInCsumErrors | 
 |  | 
 | This counter indicates the checksum of the ICMP packet is | 
 | wrong. Kernel verifies the checksum after updating the IcmpInMsgs and | 
 | before updating IcmpMsgInType[N]. If a packet has bad checksum, the | 
 | IcmpInMsgs would be updated but none of IcmpMsgInType[N] would be updated. | 
 |  | 
 | * IcmpInErrors and IcmpOutErrors | 
 |  | 
 | Defined by `RFC1213 icmpInErrors`_ and `RFC1213 icmpOutErrors`_ | 
 |  | 
 | .. _RFC1213 icmpInErrors: https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc1213#page-41 | 
 | .. _RFC1213 icmpOutErrors: https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc1213#page-43 | 
 |  | 
 | When an error occurs in the ICMP packet handler path, these two | 
 | counters would be updated. The receiving packet path use IcmpInErrors | 
 | and the sending packet path use IcmpOutErrors. When IcmpInCsumErrors | 
 | is increased, IcmpInErrors would always be increased too. | 
 |  | 
 | relationship of the ICMP counters | 
 | --------------------------------- | 
 | The sum of IcmpMsgOutType[N] is always equal to IcmpOutMsgs, as they | 
 | are updated at the same time. The sum of IcmpMsgInType[N] plus | 
 | IcmpInErrors should be equal or larger than IcmpInMsgs. When kernel | 
 | receives an ICMP packet, kernel follows below logic: | 
 |  | 
 | 1. increase IcmpInMsgs | 
 | 2. if has any error, update IcmpInErrors and finish the process | 
 | 3. update IcmpMsgOutType[N] | 
 | 4. handle the packet depending on the type, if has any error, update | 
 |    IcmpInErrors and finish the process | 
 |  | 
 | So if all errors occur in step (2), IcmpInMsgs should be equal to the | 
 | sum of IcmpMsgOutType[N] plus IcmpInErrors. If all errors occur in | 
 | step (4), IcmpInMsgs should be equal to the sum of | 
 | IcmpMsgOutType[N]. If the errors occur in both step (2) and step (4), | 
 | IcmpInMsgs should be less than the sum of IcmpMsgOutType[N] plus | 
 | IcmpInErrors. | 
 |  | 
 | General TCP counters | 
 | ==================== | 
 | * TcpInSegs | 
 |  | 
 | Defined in `RFC1213 tcpInSegs`_ | 
 |  | 
 | .. _RFC1213 tcpInSegs: https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc1213#page-48 | 
 |  | 
 | The number of packets received by the TCP layer. As mentioned in | 
 | RFC1213, it includes the packets received in error, such as checksum | 
 | error, invalid TCP header and so on. Only one error won't be included: | 
 | if the layer 2 destination address is not the NIC's layer 2 | 
 | address. It might happen if the packet is a multicast or broadcast | 
 | packet, or the NIC is in promiscuous mode. In these situations, the | 
 | packets would be delivered to the TCP layer, but the TCP layer will discard | 
 | these packets before increasing TcpInSegs. The TcpInSegs counter | 
 | isn't aware of GRO. So if two packets are merged by GRO, the TcpInSegs | 
 | counter would only increase 1. | 
 |  | 
 | * TcpOutSegs | 
 |  | 
 | Defined in `RFC1213 tcpOutSegs`_ | 
 |  | 
 | .. _RFC1213 tcpOutSegs: https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc1213#page-48 | 
 |  | 
 | The number of packets sent by the TCP layer. As mentioned in RFC1213, | 
 | it excludes the retransmitted packets. But it includes the SYN, ACK | 
 | and RST packets. Doesn't like TcpInSegs, the TcpOutSegs is aware of | 
 | GSO, so if a packet would be split to 2 by GSO, TcpOutSegs will | 
 | increase 2. | 
 |  | 
 | * TcpActiveOpens | 
 |  | 
 | Defined in `RFC1213 tcpActiveOpens`_ | 
 |  | 
 | .. _RFC1213 tcpActiveOpens: https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc1213#page-47 | 
 |  | 
 | It means the TCP layer sends a SYN, and come into the SYN-SENT | 
 | state. Every time TcpActiveOpens increases 1, TcpOutSegs should always | 
 | increase 1. | 
 |  | 
 | * TcpPassiveOpens | 
 |  | 
 | Defined in `RFC1213 tcpPassiveOpens`_ | 
 |  | 
 | .. _RFC1213 tcpPassiveOpens: https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc1213#page-47 | 
 |  | 
 | It means the TCP layer receives a SYN, replies a SYN+ACK, come into | 
 | the SYN-RCVD state. | 
 |  | 
 | * TcpExtTCPRcvCoalesce | 
 |  | 
 | When packets are received by the TCP layer and are not be read by the | 
 | application, the TCP layer will try to merge them. This counter | 
 | indicate how many packets are merged in such situation. If GRO is | 
 | enabled, lots of packets would be merged by GRO, these packets | 
 | wouldn't be counted to TcpExtTCPRcvCoalesce. | 
 |  | 
 | * TcpExtTCPAutoCorking | 
 |  | 
 | When sending packets, the TCP layer will try to merge small packets to | 
 | a bigger one. This counter increase 1 for every packet merged in such | 
 | situation. Please refer to the LWN article for more details: | 
 | https://lwn.net/Articles/576263/ | 
 |  | 
 | * TcpExtTCPOrigDataSent | 
 |  | 
 | This counter is explained by `kernel commit f19c29e3e391`_, I pasted the | 
 | explaination below:: | 
 |  | 
 |   TCPOrigDataSent: number of outgoing packets with original data (excluding | 
 |   retransmission but including data-in-SYN). This counter is different from | 
 |   TcpOutSegs because TcpOutSegs also tracks pure ACKs. TCPOrigDataSent is | 
 |   more useful to track the TCP retransmission rate. | 
 |  | 
 | * TCPSynRetrans | 
 |  | 
 | This counter is explained by `kernel commit f19c29e3e391`_, I pasted the | 
 | explaination below:: | 
 |  | 
 |   TCPSynRetrans: number of SYN and SYN/ACK retransmits to break down | 
 |   retransmissions into SYN, fast-retransmits, timeout retransmits, etc. | 
 |  | 
 | * TCPFastOpenActiveFail | 
 |  | 
 | This counter is explained by `kernel commit f19c29e3e391`_, I pasted the | 
 | explaination below:: | 
 |  | 
 |   TCPFastOpenActiveFail: Fast Open attempts (SYN/data) failed because | 
 |   the remote does not accept it or the attempts timed out. | 
 |  | 
 | .. _kernel commit f19c29e3e391: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/?id=f19c29e3e391a66a273e9afebaf01917245148cd | 
 |  | 
 | * TcpExtListenOverflows and TcpExtListenDrops | 
 |  | 
 | When kernel receives a SYN from a client, and if the TCP accept queue | 
 | is full, kernel will drop the SYN and add 1 to TcpExtListenOverflows. | 
 | At the same time kernel will also add 1 to TcpExtListenDrops. When a | 
 | TCP socket is in LISTEN state, and kernel need to drop a packet, | 
 | kernel would always add 1 to TcpExtListenDrops. So increase | 
 | TcpExtListenOverflows would let TcpExtListenDrops increasing at the | 
 | same time, but TcpExtListenDrops would also increase without | 
 | TcpExtListenOverflows increasing, e.g. a memory allocation fail would | 
 | also let TcpExtListenDrops increase. | 
 |  | 
 | Note: The above explanation is based on kernel 4.10 or above version, on | 
 | an old kernel, the TCP stack has different behavior when TCP accept | 
 | queue is full. On the old kernel, TCP stack won't drop the SYN, it | 
 | would complete the 3-way handshake. As the accept queue is full, TCP | 
 | stack will keep the socket in the TCP half-open queue. As it is in the | 
 | half open queue, TCP stack will send SYN+ACK on an exponential backoff | 
 | timer, after client replies ACK, TCP stack checks whether the accept | 
 | queue is still full, if it is not full, moves the socket to the accept | 
 | queue, if it is full, keeps the socket in the half-open queue, at next | 
 | time client replies ACK, this socket will get another chance to move | 
 | to the accept queue. | 
 |  | 
 |  | 
 | TCP Fast Open | 
 | ============= | 
 | * TcpEstabResets | 
 |  | 
 | Defined in `RFC1213 tcpEstabResets`_. | 
 |  | 
 | .. _RFC1213 tcpEstabResets: https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc1213#page-48 | 
 |  | 
 | * TcpAttemptFails | 
 |  | 
 | Defined in `RFC1213 tcpAttemptFails`_. | 
 |  | 
 | .. _RFC1213 tcpAttemptFails: https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc1213#page-48 | 
 |  | 
 | * TcpOutRsts | 
 |  | 
 | Defined in `RFC1213 tcpOutRsts`_. The RFC says this counter indicates | 
 | the 'segments sent containing the RST flag', but in linux kernel, this | 
 | couner indicates the segments kerenl tried to send. The sending | 
 | process might be failed due to some errors (e.g. memory alloc failed). | 
 |  | 
 | .. _RFC1213 tcpOutRsts: https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc1213#page-52 | 
 |  | 
 | * TcpExtTCPSpuriousRtxHostQueues | 
 |  | 
 | When the TCP stack wants to retransmit a packet, and finds that packet | 
 | is not lost in the network, but the packet is not sent yet, the TCP | 
 | stack would give up the retransmission and update this counter. It | 
 | might happen if a packet stays too long time in a qdisc or driver | 
 | queue. | 
 |  | 
 | * TcpEstabResets | 
 |  | 
 | The socket receives a RST packet in Establish or CloseWait state. | 
 |  | 
 | * TcpExtTCPKeepAlive | 
 |  | 
 | This counter indicates many keepalive packets were sent. The keepalive | 
 | won't be enabled by default. A userspace program could enable it by | 
 | setting the SO_KEEPALIVE socket option. | 
 |  | 
 | * TcpExtTCPSpuriousRTOs | 
 |  | 
 | The spurious retransmission timeout detected by the `F-RTO`_ | 
 | algorithm. | 
 |  | 
 | .. _F-RTO: https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc5682 | 
 |  | 
 | TCP Fast Path | 
 | ============= | 
 | When kernel receives a TCP packet, it has two paths to handler the | 
 | packet, one is fast path, another is slow path. The comment in kernel | 
 | code provides a good explanation of them, I pasted them below:: | 
 |  | 
 |   It is split into a fast path and a slow path. The fast path is | 
 |   disabled when: | 
 |  | 
 |   - A zero window was announced from us | 
 |   - zero window probing | 
 |     is only handled properly on the slow path. | 
 |   - Out of order segments arrived. | 
 |   - Urgent data is expected. | 
 |   - There is no buffer space left | 
 |   - Unexpected TCP flags/window values/header lengths are received | 
 |     (detected by checking the TCP header against pred_flags) | 
 |   - Data is sent in both directions. The fast path only supports pure senders | 
 |     or pure receivers (this means either the sequence number or the ack | 
 |     value must stay constant) | 
 |   - Unexpected TCP option. | 
 |  | 
 | Kernel will try to use fast path unless any of the above conditions | 
 | are satisfied. If the packets are out of order, kernel will handle | 
 | them in slow path, which means the performance might be not very | 
 | good. Kernel would also come into slow path if the "Delayed ack" is | 
 | used, because when using "Delayed ack", the data is sent in both | 
 | directions. When the TCP window scale option is not used, kernel will | 
 | try to enable fast path immediately when the connection comes into the | 
 | established state, but if the TCP window scale option is used, kernel | 
 | will disable the fast path at first, and try to enable it after kernel | 
 | receives packets. | 
 |  | 
 | * TcpExtTCPPureAcks and TcpExtTCPHPAcks | 
 |  | 
 | If a packet set ACK flag and has no data, it is a pure ACK packet, if | 
 | kernel handles it in the fast path, TcpExtTCPHPAcks will increase 1, | 
 | if kernel handles it in the slow path, TcpExtTCPPureAcks will | 
 | increase 1. | 
 |  | 
 | * TcpExtTCPHPHits | 
 |  | 
 | If a TCP packet has data (which means it is not a pure ACK packet), | 
 | and this packet is handled in the fast path, TcpExtTCPHPHits will | 
 | increase 1. | 
 |  | 
 |  | 
 | TCP abort | 
 | ========= | 
 | * TcpExtTCPAbortOnData | 
 |  | 
 | It means TCP layer has data in flight, but need to close the | 
 | connection. So TCP layer sends a RST to the other side, indicate the | 
 | connection is not closed very graceful. An easy way to increase this | 
 | counter is using the SO_LINGER option. Please refer to the SO_LINGER | 
 | section of the `socket man page`_: | 
 |  | 
 | .. _socket man page: http://man7.org/linux/man-pages/man7/socket.7.html | 
 |  | 
 | By default, when an application closes a connection, the close function | 
 | will return immediately and kernel will try to send the in-flight data | 
 | async. If you use the SO_LINGER option, set l_onoff to 1, and l_linger | 
 | to a positive number, the close function won't return immediately, but | 
 | wait for the in-flight data are acked by the other side, the max wait | 
 | time is l_linger seconds. If set l_onoff to 1 and set l_linger to 0, | 
 | when the application closes a connection, kernel will send a RST | 
 | immediately and increase the TcpExtTCPAbortOnData counter. | 
 |  | 
 | * TcpExtTCPAbortOnClose | 
 |  | 
 | This counter means the application has unread data in the TCP layer when | 
 | the application wants to close the TCP connection. In such a situation, | 
 | kernel will send a RST to the other side of the TCP connection. | 
 |  | 
 | * TcpExtTCPAbortOnMemory | 
 |  | 
 | When an application closes a TCP connection, kernel still need to track | 
 | the connection, let it complete the TCP disconnect process. E.g. an | 
 | app calls the close method of a socket, kernel sends fin to the other | 
 | side of the connection, then the app has no relationship with the | 
 | socket any more, but kernel need to keep the socket, this socket | 
 | becomes an orphan socket, kernel waits for the reply of the other side, | 
 | and would come to the TIME_WAIT state finally. When kernel has no | 
 | enough memory to keep the orphan socket, kernel would send an RST to | 
 | the other side, and delete the socket, in such situation, kernel will | 
 | increase 1 to the TcpExtTCPAbortOnMemory. Two conditions would trigger | 
 | TcpExtTCPAbortOnMemory: | 
 |  | 
 | 1. the memory used by the TCP protocol is higher than the third value of | 
 | the tcp_mem. Please refer the tcp_mem section in the `TCP man page`_: | 
 |  | 
 | .. _TCP man page: http://man7.org/linux/man-pages/man7/tcp.7.html | 
 |  | 
 | 2. the orphan socket count is higher than net.ipv4.tcp_max_orphans | 
 |  | 
 |  | 
 | * TcpExtTCPAbortOnTimeout | 
 |  | 
 | This counter will increase when any of the TCP timers expire. In such | 
 | situation, kernel won't send RST, just give up the connection. | 
 |  | 
 | * TcpExtTCPAbortOnLinger | 
 |  | 
 | When a TCP connection comes into FIN_WAIT_2 state, instead of waiting | 
 | for the fin packet from the other side, kernel could send a RST and | 
 | delete the socket immediately. This is not the default behavior of | 
 | Linux kernel TCP stack. By configuring the TCP_LINGER2 socket option, | 
 | you could let kernel follow this behavior. | 
 |  | 
 | * TcpExtTCPAbortFailed | 
 |  | 
 | The kernel TCP layer will send RST if the `RFC2525 2.17 section`_ is | 
 | satisfied. If an internal error occurs during this process, | 
 | TcpExtTCPAbortFailed will be increased. | 
 |  | 
 | .. _RFC2525 2.17 section: https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc2525#page-50 | 
 |  | 
 | TCP Hybrid Slow Start | 
 | ===================== | 
 | The Hybrid Slow Start algorithm is an enhancement of the traditional | 
 | TCP congestion window Slow Start algorithm. It uses two pieces of | 
 | information to detect whether the max bandwidth of the TCP path is | 
 | approached. The two pieces of information are ACK train length and | 
 | increase in packet delay. For detail information, please refer the | 
 | `Hybrid Slow Start paper`_. Either ACK train length or packet delay | 
 | hits a specific threshold, the congestion control algorithm will come | 
 | into the Congestion Avoidance state. Until v4.20, two congestion | 
 | control algorithms are using Hybrid Slow Start, they are cubic (the | 
 | default congestion control algorithm) and cdg. Four snmp counters | 
 | relate with the Hybrid Slow Start algorithm. | 
 |  | 
 | .. _Hybrid Slow Start paper: https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/25e9/ef3f03315782c7f1cbcd31b587857adae7d1.pdf | 
 |  | 
 | * TcpExtTCPHystartTrainDetect | 
 |  | 
 | How many times the ACK train length threshold is detected | 
 |  | 
 | * TcpExtTCPHystartTrainCwnd | 
 |  | 
 | The sum of CWND detected by ACK train length. Dividing this value by | 
 | TcpExtTCPHystartTrainDetect is the average CWND which detected by the | 
 | ACK train length. | 
 |  | 
 | * TcpExtTCPHystartDelayDetect | 
 |  | 
 | How many times the packet delay threshold is detected. | 
 |  | 
 | * TcpExtTCPHystartDelayCwnd | 
 |  | 
 | The sum of CWND detected by packet delay. Dividing this value by | 
 | TcpExtTCPHystartDelayDetect is the average CWND which detected by the | 
 | packet delay. | 
 |  | 
 | TCP retransmission and congestion control | 
 | ========================================= | 
 | The TCP protocol has two retransmission mechanisms: SACK and fast | 
 | recovery. They are exclusive with each other. When SACK is enabled, | 
 | the kernel TCP stack would use SACK, or kernel would use fast | 
 | recovery. The SACK is a TCP option, which is defined in `RFC2018`_, | 
 | the fast recovery is defined in `RFC6582`_, which is also called | 
 | 'Reno'. | 
 |  | 
 | The TCP congestion control is a big and complex topic. To understand | 
 | the related snmp counter, we need to know the states of the congestion | 
 | control state machine. There are 5 states: Open, Disorder, CWR, | 
 | Recovery and Loss. For details about these states, please refer page 5 | 
 | and page 6 of this document: | 
 | https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/0e9c/968d09ab2e53e24c4dca5b2d67c7f7140f8e.pdf | 
 |  | 
 | .. _RFC2018: https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc2018 | 
 | .. _RFC6582: https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc6582 | 
 |  | 
 | * TcpExtTCPRenoRecovery and TcpExtTCPSackRecovery | 
 |  | 
 | When the congestion control comes into Recovery state, if sack is | 
 | used, TcpExtTCPSackRecovery increases 1, if sack is not used, | 
 | TcpExtTCPRenoRecovery increases 1. These two counters mean the TCP | 
 | stack begins to retransmit the lost packets. | 
 |  | 
 | * TcpExtTCPSACKReneging | 
 |  | 
 | A packet was acknowledged by SACK, but the receiver has dropped this | 
 | packet, so the sender needs to retransmit this packet. In this | 
 | situation, the sender adds 1 to TcpExtTCPSACKReneging. A receiver | 
 | could drop a packet which has been acknowledged by SACK, although it is | 
 | unusual, it is allowed by the TCP protocol. The sender doesn't really | 
 | know what happened on the receiver side. The sender just waits until | 
 | the RTO expires for this packet, then the sender assumes this packet | 
 | has been dropped by the receiver. | 
 |  | 
 | * TcpExtTCPRenoReorder | 
 |  | 
 | The reorder packet is detected by fast recovery. It would only be used | 
 | if SACK is disabled. The fast recovery algorithm detects recorder by | 
 | the duplicate ACK number. E.g., if retransmission is triggered, and | 
 | the original retransmitted packet is not lost, it is just out of | 
 | order, the receiver would acknowledge multiple times, one for the | 
 | retransmitted packet, another for the arriving of the original out of | 
 | order packet. Thus the sender would find more ACks than its | 
 | expectation, and the sender knows out of order occurs. | 
 |  | 
 | * TcpExtTCPTSReorder | 
 |  | 
 | The reorder packet is detected when a hole is filled. E.g., assume the | 
 | sender sends packet 1,2,3,4,5, and the receiving order is | 
 | 1,2,4,5,3. When the sender receives the ACK of packet 3 (which will | 
 | fill the hole), two conditions will let TcpExtTCPTSReorder increase | 
 | 1: (1) if the packet 3 is not re-retransmitted yet. (2) if the packet | 
 | 3 is retransmitted but the timestamp of the packet 3's ACK is earlier | 
 | than the retransmission timestamp. | 
 |  | 
 | * TcpExtTCPSACKReorder | 
 |  | 
 | The reorder packet detected by SACK. The SACK has two methods to | 
 | detect reorder: (1) DSACK is received by the sender. It means the | 
 | sender sends the same packet more than one times. And the only reason | 
 | is the sender believes an out of order packet is lost so it sends the | 
 | packet again. (2) Assume packet 1,2,3,4,5 are sent by the sender, and | 
 | the sender has received SACKs for packet 2 and 5, now the sender | 
 | receives SACK for packet 4 and the sender doesn't retransmit the | 
 | packet yet, the sender would know packet 4 is out of order. The TCP | 
 | stack of kernel will increase TcpExtTCPSACKReorder for both of the | 
 | above scenarios. | 
 |  | 
 | * TcpExtTCPSlowStartRetrans | 
 |  | 
 | The TCP stack wants to retransmit a packet and the congestion control | 
 | state is 'Loss'. | 
 |  | 
 | * TcpExtTCPFastRetrans | 
 |  | 
 | The TCP stack wants to retransmit a packet and the congestion control | 
 | state is not 'Loss'. | 
 |  | 
 | * TcpExtTCPLostRetransmit | 
 |  | 
 | A SACK points out that a retransmission packet is lost again. | 
 |  | 
 | * TcpExtTCPRetransFail | 
 |  | 
 | The TCP stack tries to deliver a retransmission packet to lower layers | 
 | but the lower layers return an error. | 
 |  | 
 | * TcpExtTCPSynRetrans | 
 |  | 
 | The TCP stack retransmits a SYN packet. | 
 |  | 
 | DSACK | 
 | ===== | 
 | The DSACK is defined in `RFC2883`_. The receiver uses DSACK to report | 
 | duplicate packets to the sender. There are two kinds of | 
 | duplications: (1) a packet which has been acknowledged is | 
 | duplicate. (2) an out of order packet is duplicate. The TCP stack | 
 | counts these two kinds of duplications on both receiver side and | 
 | sender side. | 
 |  | 
 | .. _RFC2883 : https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc2883 | 
 |  | 
 | * TcpExtTCPDSACKOldSent | 
 |  | 
 | The TCP stack receives a duplicate packet which has been acked, so it | 
 | sends a DSACK to the sender. | 
 |  | 
 | * TcpExtTCPDSACKOfoSent | 
 |  | 
 | The TCP stack receives an out of order duplicate packet, so it sends a | 
 | DSACK to the sender. | 
 |  | 
 | * TcpExtTCPDSACKRecv | 
 |  | 
 | The TCP stack receives a DSACK, which indicates an acknowledged | 
 | duplicate packet is received. | 
 |  | 
 | * TcpExtTCPDSACKOfoRecv | 
 |  | 
 | The TCP stack receives a DSACK, which indicate an out of order | 
 | duplicate packet is received. | 
 |  | 
 | invalid SACK and DSACK | 
 | ====================== | 
 | When a SACK (or DSACK) block is invalid, a corresponding counter would | 
 | be updated. The validation method is base on the start/end sequence | 
 | number of the SACK block. For more details, please refer the comment | 
 | of the function tcp_is_sackblock_valid in the kernel source code. A | 
 | SACK option could have up to 4 blocks, they are checked | 
 | individually. E.g., if 3 blocks of a SACk is invalid, the | 
 | corresponding counter would be updated 3 times. The comment of the | 
 | `Add counters for discarded SACK blocks`_ patch has additional | 
 | explaination: | 
 |  | 
 | .. _Add counters for discarded SACK blocks: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/?id=18f02545a9a16c9a89778b91a162ad16d510bb32 | 
 |  | 
 | * TcpExtTCPSACKDiscard | 
 |  | 
 | This counter indicates how many SACK blocks are invalid. If the invalid | 
 | SACK block is caused by ACK recording, the TCP stack will only ignore | 
 | it and won't update this counter. | 
 |  | 
 | * TcpExtTCPDSACKIgnoredOld and TcpExtTCPDSACKIgnoredNoUndo | 
 |  | 
 | When a DSACK block is invalid, one of these two counters would be | 
 | updated. Which counter will be updated depends on the undo_marker flag | 
 | of the TCP socket. If the undo_marker is not set, the TCP stack isn't | 
 | likely to re-transmit any packets, and we still receive an invalid | 
 | DSACK block, the reason might be that the packet is duplicated in the | 
 | middle of the network. In such scenario, TcpExtTCPDSACKIgnoredNoUndo | 
 | will be updated. If the undo_marker is set, TcpExtTCPDSACKIgnoredOld | 
 | will be updated. As implied in its name, it might be an old packet. | 
 |  | 
 | SACK shift | 
 | ========== | 
 | The linux networking stack stores data in sk_buff struct (skb for | 
 | short). If a SACK block acrosses multiple skb, the TCP stack will try | 
 | to re-arrange data in these skb. E.g. if a SACK block acknowledges seq | 
 | 10 to 15, skb1 has seq 10 to 13, skb2 has seq 14 to 20. The seq 14 and | 
 | 15 in skb2 would be moved to skb1. This operation is 'shift'. If a | 
 | SACK block acknowledges seq 10 to 20, skb1 has seq 10 to 13, skb2 has | 
 | seq 14 to 20. All data in skb2 will be moved to skb1, and skb2 will be | 
 | discard, this operation is 'merge'. | 
 |  | 
 | * TcpExtTCPSackShifted | 
 |  | 
 | A skb is shifted | 
 |  | 
 | * TcpExtTCPSackMerged | 
 |  | 
 | A skb is merged | 
 |  | 
 | * TcpExtTCPSackShiftFallback | 
 |  | 
 | A skb should be shifted or merged, but the TCP stack doesn't do it for | 
 | some reasons. | 
 |  | 
 | TCP out of order | 
 | ================ | 
 | * TcpExtTCPOFOQueue | 
 |  | 
 | The TCP layer receives an out of order packet and has enough memory | 
 | to queue it. | 
 |  | 
 | * TcpExtTCPOFODrop | 
 |  | 
 | The TCP layer receives an out of order packet but doesn't have enough | 
 | memory, so drops it. Such packets won't be counted into | 
 | TcpExtTCPOFOQueue. | 
 |  | 
 | * TcpExtTCPOFOMerge | 
 |  | 
 | The received out of order packet has an overlay with the previous | 
 | packet. the overlay part will be dropped. All of TcpExtTCPOFOMerge | 
 | packets will also be counted into TcpExtTCPOFOQueue. | 
 |  | 
 | TCP PAWS | 
 | ======== | 
 | PAWS (Protection Against Wrapped Sequence numbers) is an algorithm | 
 | which is used to drop old packets. It depends on the TCP | 
 | timestamps. For detail information, please refer the `timestamp wiki`_ | 
 | and the `RFC of PAWS`_. | 
 |  | 
 | .. _RFC of PAWS: https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc1323#page-17 | 
 | .. _timestamp wiki: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Transmission_Control_Protocol#TCP_timestamps | 
 |  | 
 | * TcpExtPAWSActive | 
 |  | 
 | Packets are dropped by PAWS in Syn-Sent status. | 
 |  | 
 | * TcpExtPAWSEstab | 
 |  | 
 | Packets are dropped by PAWS in any status other than Syn-Sent. | 
 |  | 
 | TCP ACK skip | 
 | ============ | 
 | In some scenarios, kernel would avoid sending duplicate ACKs too | 
 | frequently. Please find more details in the tcp_invalid_ratelimit | 
 | section of the `sysctl document`_. When kernel decides to skip an ACK | 
 | due to tcp_invalid_ratelimit, kernel would update one of below | 
 | counters to indicate the ACK is skipped in which scenario. The ACK | 
 | would only be skipped if the received packet is either a SYN packet or | 
 | it has no data. | 
 |  | 
 | .. _sysctl document: https://www.kernel.org/doc/Documentation/networking/ip-sysctl.txt | 
 |  | 
 | * TcpExtTCPACKSkippedSynRecv | 
 |  | 
 | The ACK is skipped in Syn-Recv status. The Syn-Recv status means the | 
 | TCP stack receives a SYN and replies SYN+ACK. Now the TCP stack is | 
 | waiting for an ACK. Generally, the TCP stack doesn't need to send ACK | 
 | in the Syn-Recv status. But in several scenarios, the TCP stack need | 
 | to send an ACK. E.g., the TCP stack receives the same SYN packet | 
 | repeately, the received packet does not pass the PAWS check, or the | 
 | received packet sequence number is out of window. In these scenarios, | 
 | the TCP stack needs to send ACK. If the ACk sending frequency is higher than | 
 | tcp_invalid_ratelimit allows, the TCP stack will skip sending ACK and | 
 | increase TcpExtTCPACKSkippedSynRecv. | 
 |  | 
 |  | 
 | * TcpExtTCPACKSkippedPAWS | 
 |  | 
 | The ACK is skipped due to PAWS (Protect Against Wrapped Sequence | 
 | numbers) check fails. If the PAWS check fails in Syn-Recv, Fin-Wait-2 | 
 | or Time-Wait statuses, the skipped ACK would be counted to | 
 | TcpExtTCPACKSkippedSynRecv, TcpExtTCPACKSkippedFinWait2 or | 
 | TcpExtTCPACKSkippedTimeWait. In all other statuses, the skipped ACK | 
 | would be counted to TcpExtTCPACKSkippedPAWS. | 
 |  | 
 | * TcpExtTCPACKSkippedSeq | 
 |  | 
 | The sequence number is out of window and the timestamp passes the PAWS | 
 | check and the TCP status is not Syn-Recv, Fin-Wait-2, and Time-Wait. | 
 |  | 
 | * TcpExtTCPACKSkippedFinWait2 | 
 |  | 
 | The ACK is skipped in Fin-Wait-2 status, the reason would be either | 
 | PAWS check fails or the received sequence number is out of window. | 
 |  | 
 | * TcpExtTCPACKSkippedTimeWait | 
 |  | 
 | Tha ACK is skipped in Time-Wait status, the reason would be either | 
 | PAWS check failed or the received sequence number is out of window. | 
 |  | 
 | * TcpExtTCPACKSkippedChallenge | 
 |  | 
 | The ACK is skipped if the ACK is a challenge ACK. The RFC 5961 defines | 
 | 3 kind of challenge ACK, please refer `RFC 5961 section 3.2`_, | 
 | `RFC 5961 section 4.2`_ and `RFC 5961 section 5.2`_. Besides these | 
 | three scenarios, In some TCP status, the linux TCP stack would also | 
 | send challenge ACKs if the ACK number is before the first | 
 | unacknowledged number (more strict than `RFC 5961 section 5.2`_). | 
 |  | 
 | .. _RFC 5961 section 3.2: https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc5961#page-7 | 
 | .. _RFC 5961 section 4.2: https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc5961#page-9 | 
 | .. _RFC 5961 section 5.2: https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc5961#page-11 | 
 |  | 
 | TCP receive window | 
 | ================== | 
 | * TcpExtTCPWantZeroWindowAdv | 
 |  | 
 | Depending on current memory usage, the TCP stack tries to set receive | 
 | window to zero. But the receive window might still be a no-zero | 
 | value. For example, if the previous window size is 10, and the TCP | 
 | stack receives 3 bytes, the current window size would be 7 even if the | 
 | window size calculated by the memory usage is zero. | 
 |  | 
 | * TcpExtTCPToZeroWindowAdv | 
 |  | 
 | The TCP receive window is set to zero from a no-zero value. | 
 |  | 
 | * TcpExtTCPFromZeroWindowAdv | 
 |  | 
 | The TCP receive window is set to no-zero value from zero. | 
 |  | 
 |  | 
 | Delayed ACK | 
 | =========== | 
 | The TCP Delayed ACK is a technique which is used for reducing the | 
 | packet count in the network. For more details, please refer the | 
 | `Delayed ACK wiki`_ | 
 |  | 
 | .. _Delayed ACK wiki: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/TCP_delayed_acknowledgment | 
 |  | 
 | * TcpExtDelayedACKs | 
 |  | 
 | A delayed ACK timer expires. The TCP stack will send a pure ACK packet | 
 | and exit the delayed ACK mode. | 
 |  | 
 | * TcpExtDelayedACKLocked | 
 |  | 
 | A delayed ACK timer expires, but the TCP stack can't send an ACK | 
 | immediately due to the socket is locked by a userspace program. The | 
 | TCP stack will send a pure ACK later (after the userspace program | 
 | unlock the socket). When the TCP stack sends the pure ACK later, the | 
 | TCP stack will also update TcpExtDelayedACKs and exit the delayed ACK | 
 | mode. | 
 |  | 
 | * TcpExtDelayedACKLost | 
 |  | 
 | It will be updated when the TCP stack receives a packet which has been | 
 | ACKed. A Delayed ACK loss might cause this issue, but it would also be | 
 | triggered by other reasons, such as a packet is duplicated in the | 
 | network. | 
 |  | 
 | Tail Loss Probe (TLP) | 
 | ===================== | 
 | TLP is an algorithm which is used to detect TCP packet loss. For more | 
 | details, please refer the `TLP paper`_. | 
 |  | 
 | .. _TLP paper: https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-dukkipati-tcpm-tcp-loss-probe-01 | 
 |  | 
 | * TcpExtTCPLossProbes | 
 |  | 
 | A TLP probe packet is sent. | 
 |  | 
 | * TcpExtTCPLossProbeRecovery | 
 |  | 
 | A packet loss is detected and recovered by TLP. | 
 |  | 
 | TCP Fast Open | 
 | ============= | 
 | TCP Fast Open is a technology which allows data transfer before the | 
 | 3-way handshake complete. Please refer the `TCP Fast Open wiki`_ for a | 
 | general description. | 
 |  | 
 | .. _TCP Fast Open wiki: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/TCP_Fast_Open | 
 |  | 
 | * TcpExtTCPFastOpenActive | 
 |  | 
 | When the TCP stack receives an ACK packet in the SYN-SENT status, and | 
 | the ACK packet acknowledges the data in the SYN packet, the TCP stack | 
 | understand the TFO cookie is accepted by the other side, then it | 
 | updates this counter. | 
 |  | 
 | * TcpExtTCPFastOpenActiveFail | 
 |  | 
 | This counter indicates that the TCP stack initiated a TCP Fast Open, | 
 | but it failed. This counter would be updated in three scenarios: (1) | 
 | the other side doesn't acknowledge the data in the SYN packet. (2) The | 
 | SYN packet which has the TFO cookie is timeout at least once. (3) | 
 | after the 3-way handshake, the retransmission timeout happens | 
 | net.ipv4.tcp_retries1 times, because some middle-boxes may black-hole | 
 | fast open after the handshake. | 
 |  | 
 | * TcpExtTCPFastOpenPassive | 
 |  | 
 | This counter indicates how many times the TCP stack accepts the fast | 
 | open request. | 
 |  | 
 | * TcpExtTCPFastOpenPassiveFail | 
 |  | 
 | This counter indicates how many times the TCP stack rejects the fast | 
 | open request. It is caused by either the TFO cookie is invalid or the | 
 | TCP stack finds an error during the socket creating process. | 
 |  | 
 | * TcpExtTCPFastOpenListenOverflow | 
 |  | 
 | When the pending fast open request number is larger than | 
 | fastopenq->max_qlen, the TCP stack will reject the fast open request | 
 | and update this counter. When this counter is updated, the TCP stack | 
 | won't update TcpExtTCPFastOpenPassive or | 
 | TcpExtTCPFastOpenPassiveFail. The fastopenq->max_qlen is set by the | 
 | TCP_FASTOPEN socket operation and it could not be larger than | 
 | net.core.somaxconn. For example: | 
 |  | 
 | setsockopt(sfd, SOL_TCP, TCP_FASTOPEN, &qlen, sizeof(qlen)); | 
 |  | 
 | * TcpExtTCPFastOpenCookieReqd | 
 |  | 
 | This counter indicates how many times a client wants to request a TFO | 
 | cookie. | 
 |  | 
 | SYN cookies | 
 | =========== | 
 | SYN cookies are used to mitigate SYN flood, for details, please refer | 
 | the `SYN cookies wiki`_. | 
 |  | 
 | .. _SYN cookies wiki: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SYN_cookies | 
 |  | 
 | * TcpExtSyncookiesSent | 
 |  | 
 | It indicates how many SYN cookies are sent. | 
 |  | 
 | * TcpExtSyncookiesRecv | 
 |  | 
 | How many reply packets of the SYN cookies the TCP stack receives. | 
 |  | 
 | * TcpExtSyncookiesFailed | 
 |  | 
 | The MSS decoded from the SYN cookie is invalid. When this counter is | 
 | updated, the received packet won't be treated as a SYN cookie and the | 
 | TcpExtSyncookiesRecv counter wont be updated. | 
 |  | 
 | Challenge ACK | 
 | ============= | 
 | For details of challenge ACK, please refer the explaination of | 
 | TcpExtTCPACKSkippedChallenge. | 
 |  | 
 | * TcpExtTCPChallengeACK | 
 |  | 
 | The number of challenge acks sent. | 
 |  | 
 | * TcpExtTCPSYNChallenge | 
 |  | 
 | The number of challenge acks sent in response to SYN packets. After | 
 | updates this counter, the TCP stack might send a challenge ACK and | 
 | update the TcpExtTCPChallengeACK counter, or it might also skip to | 
 | send the challenge and update the TcpExtTCPACKSkippedChallenge. | 
 |  | 
 | prune | 
 | ===== | 
 | When a socket is under memory pressure, the TCP stack will try to | 
 | reclaim memory from the receiving queue and out of order queue. One of | 
 | the reclaiming method is 'collapse', which means allocate a big sbk, | 
 | copy the contiguous skbs to the single big skb, and free these | 
 | contiguous skbs. | 
 |  | 
 | * TcpExtPruneCalled | 
 |  | 
 | The TCP stack tries to reclaim memory for a socket. After updates this | 
 | counter, the TCP stack will try to collapse the out of order queue and | 
 | the receiving queue. If the memory is still not enough, the TCP stack | 
 | will try to discard packets from the out of order queue (and update the | 
 | TcpExtOfoPruned counter) | 
 |  | 
 | * TcpExtOfoPruned | 
 |  | 
 | The TCP stack tries to discard packet on the out of order queue. | 
 |  | 
 | * TcpExtRcvPruned | 
 |  | 
 | After 'collapse' and discard packets from the out of order queue, if | 
 | the actually used memory is still larger than the max allowed memory, | 
 | this counter will be updated. It means the 'prune' fails. | 
 |  | 
 | * TcpExtTCPRcvCollapsed | 
 |  | 
 | This counter indicates how many skbs are freed during 'collapse'. | 
 |  | 
 | examples | 
 | ======== | 
 |  | 
 | ping test | 
 | --------- | 
 | Run the ping command against the public dns server 8.8.8.8:: | 
 |  | 
 |   nstatuser@nstat-a:~$ ping 8.8.8.8 -c 1 | 
 |   PING 8.8.8.8 (8.8.8.8) 56(84) bytes of data. | 
 |   64 bytes from 8.8.8.8: icmp_seq=1 ttl=119 time=17.8 ms | 
 |  | 
 |   --- 8.8.8.8 ping statistics --- | 
 |   1 packets transmitted, 1 received, 0% packet loss, time 0ms | 
 |   rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 17.875/17.875/17.875/0.000 ms | 
 |  | 
 | The nstayt result:: | 
 |  | 
 |   nstatuser@nstat-a:~$ nstat | 
 |   #kernel | 
 |   IpInReceives                    1                  0.0 | 
 |   IpInDelivers                    1                  0.0 | 
 |   IpOutRequests                   1                  0.0 | 
 |   IcmpInMsgs                      1                  0.0 | 
 |   IcmpInEchoReps                  1                  0.0 | 
 |   IcmpOutMsgs                     1                  0.0 | 
 |   IcmpOutEchos                    1                  0.0 | 
 |   IcmpMsgInType0                  1                  0.0 | 
 |   IcmpMsgOutType8                 1                  0.0 | 
 |   IpExtInOctets                   84                 0.0 | 
 |   IpExtOutOctets                  84                 0.0 | 
 |   IpExtInNoECTPkts                1                  0.0 | 
 |  | 
 | The Linux server sent an ICMP Echo packet, so IpOutRequests, | 
 | IcmpOutMsgs, IcmpOutEchos and IcmpMsgOutType8 were increased 1. The | 
 | server got ICMP Echo Reply from 8.8.8.8, so IpInReceives, IcmpInMsgs, | 
 | IcmpInEchoReps and IcmpMsgInType0 were increased 1. The ICMP Echo Reply | 
 | was passed to the ICMP layer via IP layer, so IpInDelivers was | 
 | increased 1. The default ping data size is 48, so an ICMP Echo packet | 
 | and its corresponding Echo Reply packet are constructed by: | 
 |  | 
 | * 14 bytes MAC header | 
 | * 20 bytes IP header | 
 | * 16 bytes ICMP header | 
 | * 48 bytes data (default value of the ping command) | 
 |  | 
 | So the IpExtInOctets and IpExtOutOctets are 20+16+48=84. | 
 |  | 
 | tcp 3-way handshake | 
 | ------------------- | 
 | On server side, we run:: | 
 |  | 
 |   nstatuser@nstat-b:~$ nc -lknv 0.0.0.0 9000 | 
 |   Listening on [0.0.0.0] (family 0, port 9000) | 
 |  | 
 | On client side, we run:: | 
 |  | 
 |   nstatuser@nstat-a:~$ nc -nv 192.168.122.251 9000 | 
 |   Connection to 192.168.122.251 9000 port [tcp/*] succeeded! | 
 |  | 
 | The server listened on tcp 9000 port, the client connected to it, they | 
 | completed the 3-way handshake. | 
 |  | 
 | On server side, we can find below nstat output:: | 
 |  | 
 |   nstatuser@nstat-b:~$ nstat | grep -i tcp | 
 |   TcpPassiveOpens                 1                  0.0 | 
 |   TcpInSegs                       2                  0.0 | 
 |   TcpOutSegs                      1                  0.0 | 
 |   TcpExtTCPPureAcks               1                  0.0 | 
 |  | 
 | On client side, we can find below nstat output:: | 
 |  | 
 |   nstatuser@nstat-a:~$ nstat | grep -i tcp | 
 |   TcpActiveOpens                  1                  0.0 | 
 |   TcpInSegs                       1                  0.0 | 
 |   TcpOutSegs                      2                  0.0 | 
 |  | 
 | When the server received the first SYN, it replied a SYN+ACK, and came into | 
 | SYN-RCVD state, so TcpPassiveOpens increased 1. The server received | 
 | SYN, sent SYN+ACK, received ACK, so server sent 1 packet, received 2 | 
 | packets, TcpInSegs increased 2, TcpOutSegs increased 1. The last ACK | 
 | of the 3-way handshake is a pure ACK without data, so | 
 | TcpExtTCPPureAcks increased 1. | 
 |  | 
 | When the client sent SYN, the client came into the SYN-SENT state, so | 
 | TcpActiveOpens increased 1, the client sent SYN, received SYN+ACK, sent | 
 | ACK, so client sent 2 packets, received 1 packet, TcpInSegs increased | 
 | 1, TcpOutSegs increased 2. | 
 |  | 
 | TCP normal traffic | 
 | ------------------ | 
 | Run nc on server:: | 
 |  | 
 |   nstatuser@nstat-b:~$ nc -lkv 0.0.0.0 9000 | 
 |   Listening on [0.0.0.0] (family 0, port 9000) | 
 |  | 
 | Run nc on client:: | 
 |  | 
 |   nstatuser@nstat-a:~$ nc -v nstat-b 9000 | 
 |   Connection to nstat-b 9000 port [tcp/*] succeeded! | 
 |  | 
 | Input a string in the nc client ('hello' in our example):: | 
 |  | 
 |   nstatuser@nstat-a:~$ nc -v nstat-b 9000 | 
 |   Connection to nstat-b 9000 port [tcp/*] succeeded! | 
 |   hello | 
 |  | 
 | The client side nstat output:: | 
 |  | 
 |   nstatuser@nstat-a:~$ nstat | 
 |   #kernel | 
 |   IpInReceives                    1                  0.0 | 
 |   IpInDelivers                    1                  0.0 | 
 |   IpOutRequests                   1                  0.0 | 
 |   TcpInSegs                       1                  0.0 | 
 |   TcpOutSegs                      1                  0.0 | 
 |   TcpExtTCPPureAcks               1                  0.0 | 
 |   TcpExtTCPOrigDataSent           1                  0.0 | 
 |   IpExtInOctets                   52                 0.0 | 
 |   IpExtOutOctets                  58                 0.0 | 
 |   IpExtInNoECTPkts                1                  0.0 | 
 |  | 
 | The server side nstat output:: | 
 |  | 
 |   nstatuser@nstat-b:~$ nstat | 
 |   #kernel | 
 |   IpInReceives                    1                  0.0 | 
 |   IpInDelivers                    1                  0.0 | 
 |   IpOutRequests                   1                  0.0 | 
 |   TcpInSegs                       1                  0.0 | 
 |   TcpOutSegs                      1                  0.0 | 
 |   IpExtInOctets                   58                 0.0 | 
 |   IpExtOutOctets                  52                 0.0 | 
 |   IpExtInNoECTPkts                1                  0.0 | 
 |  | 
 | Input a string in nc client side again ('world' in our exmaple):: | 
 |  | 
 |   nstatuser@nstat-a:~$ nc -v nstat-b 9000 | 
 |   Connection to nstat-b 9000 port [tcp/*] succeeded! | 
 |   hello | 
 |   world | 
 |  | 
 | Client side nstat output:: | 
 |  | 
 |   nstatuser@nstat-a:~$ nstat | 
 |   #kernel | 
 |   IpInReceives                    1                  0.0 | 
 |   IpInDelivers                    1                  0.0 | 
 |   IpOutRequests                   1                  0.0 | 
 |   TcpInSegs                       1                  0.0 | 
 |   TcpOutSegs                      1                  0.0 | 
 |   TcpExtTCPHPAcks                 1                  0.0 | 
 |   TcpExtTCPOrigDataSent           1                  0.0 | 
 |   IpExtInOctets                   52                 0.0 | 
 |   IpExtOutOctets                  58                 0.0 | 
 |   IpExtInNoECTPkts                1                  0.0 | 
 |  | 
 |  | 
 | Server side nstat output:: | 
 |  | 
 |   nstatuser@nstat-b:~$ nstat | 
 |   #kernel | 
 |   IpInReceives                    1                  0.0 | 
 |   IpInDelivers                    1                  0.0 | 
 |   IpOutRequests                   1                  0.0 | 
 |   TcpInSegs                       1                  0.0 | 
 |   TcpOutSegs                      1                  0.0 | 
 |   TcpExtTCPHPHits                 1                  0.0 | 
 |   IpExtInOctets                   58                 0.0 | 
 |   IpExtOutOctets                  52                 0.0 | 
 |   IpExtInNoECTPkts                1                  0.0 | 
 |  | 
 | Compare the first client-side nstat and the second client-side nstat, | 
 | we could find one difference: the first one had a 'TcpExtTCPPureAcks', | 
 | but the second one had a 'TcpExtTCPHPAcks'. The first server-side | 
 | nstat and the second server-side nstat had a difference too: the | 
 | second server-side nstat had a TcpExtTCPHPHits, but the first | 
 | server-side nstat didn't have it. The network traffic patterns were | 
 | exactly the same: the client sent a packet to the server, the server | 
 | replied an ACK. But kernel handled them in different ways. When the | 
 | TCP window scale option is not used, kernel will try to enable fast | 
 | path immediately when the connection comes into the established state, | 
 | but if the TCP window scale option is used, kernel will disable the | 
 | fast path at first, and try to enable it after kerenl receives | 
 | packets. We could use the 'ss' command to verify whether the window | 
 | scale option is used. e.g. run below command on either server or | 
 | client:: | 
 |  | 
 |   nstatuser@nstat-a:~$ ss -o state established -i '( dport = :9000 or sport = :9000 ) | 
 |   Netid    Recv-Q     Send-Q            Local Address:Port             Peer Address:Port | 
 |   tcp      0          0               192.168.122.250:40654         192.168.122.251:9000 | 
 |              ts sack cubic wscale:7,7 rto:204 rtt:0.98/0.49 mss:1448 pmtu:1500 rcvmss:536 advmss:1448 cwnd:10 bytes_acked:1 segs_out:2 segs_in:1 send 118.2Mbps lastsnd:46572 lastrcv:46572 lastack:46572 pacing_rate 236.4Mbps rcv_space:29200 rcv_ssthresh:29200 minrtt:0.98 | 
 |  | 
 | The 'wscale:7,7' means both server and client set the window scale | 
 | option to 7. Now we could explain the nstat output in our test: | 
 |  | 
 | In the first nstat output of client side, the client sent a packet, server | 
 | reply an ACK, when kernel handled this ACK, the fast path was not | 
 | enabled, so the ACK was counted into 'TcpExtTCPPureAcks'. | 
 |  | 
 | In the second nstat output of client side, the client sent a packet again, | 
 | and received another ACK from the server, in this time, the fast path is | 
 | enabled, and the ACK was qualified for fast path, so it was handled by | 
 | the fast path, so this ACK was counted into TcpExtTCPHPAcks. | 
 |  | 
 | In the first nstat output of server side, fast path was not enabled, | 
 | so there was no 'TcpExtTCPHPHits'. | 
 |  | 
 | In the second nstat output of server side, the fast path was enabled, | 
 | and the packet received from client qualified for fast path, so it | 
 | was counted into 'TcpExtTCPHPHits'. | 
 |  | 
 | TcpExtTCPAbortOnClose | 
 | --------------------- | 
 | On the server side, we run below python script:: | 
 |  | 
 |   import socket | 
 |   import time | 
 |  | 
 |   port = 9000 | 
 |  | 
 |   s = socket.socket(socket.AF_INET, socket.SOCK_STREAM) | 
 |   s.bind(('0.0.0.0', port)) | 
 |   s.listen(1) | 
 |   sock, addr = s.accept() | 
 |   while True: | 
 |       time.sleep(9999999) | 
 |  | 
 | This python script listen on 9000 port, but doesn't read anything from | 
 | the connection. | 
 |  | 
 | On the client side, we send the string "hello" by nc:: | 
 |  | 
 |   nstatuser@nstat-a:~$ echo "hello" | nc nstat-b 9000 | 
 |  | 
 | Then, we come back to the server side, the server has received the "hello" | 
 | packet, and the TCP layer has acked this packet, but the application didn't | 
 | read it yet. We type Ctrl-C to terminate the server script. Then we | 
 | could find TcpExtTCPAbortOnClose increased 1 on the server side:: | 
 |  | 
 |   nstatuser@nstat-b:~$ nstat | grep -i abort | 
 |   TcpExtTCPAbortOnClose           1                  0.0 | 
 |  | 
 | If we run tcpdump on the server side, we could find the server sent a | 
 | RST after we type Ctrl-C. | 
 |  | 
 | TcpExtTCPAbortOnMemory and TcpExtTCPAbortOnTimeout | 
 | --------------------------------------------------- | 
 | Below is an example which let the orphan socket count be higher than | 
 | net.ipv4.tcp_max_orphans. | 
 | Change tcp_max_orphans to a smaller value on client:: | 
 |  | 
 |   sudo bash -c "echo 10 > /proc/sys/net/ipv4/tcp_max_orphans" | 
 |  | 
 | Client code (create 64 connection to server):: | 
 |  | 
 |   nstatuser@nstat-a:~$ cat client_orphan.py | 
 |   import socket | 
 |   import time | 
 |  | 
 |   server = 'nstat-b' # server address | 
 |   port = 9000 | 
 |  | 
 |   count = 64 | 
 |  | 
 |   connection_list = [] | 
 |  | 
 |   for i in range(64): | 
 |       s = socket.socket(socket.AF_INET, socket.SOCK_STREAM) | 
 |       s.connect((server, port)) | 
 |       connection_list.append(s) | 
 |       print("connection_count: %d" % len(connection_list)) | 
 |  | 
 |   while True: | 
 |       time.sleep(99999) | 
 |  | 
 | Server code (accept 64 connection from client):: | 
 |  | 
 |   nstatuser@nstat-b:~$ cat server_orphan.py | 
 |   import socket | 
 |   import time | 
 |  | 
 |   port = 9000 | 
 |   count = 64 | 
 |  | 
 |   s = socket.socket(socket.AF_INET, socket.SOCK_STREAM) | 
 |   s.bind(('0.0.0.0', port)) | 
 |   s.listen(count) | 
 |   connection_list = [] | 
 |   while True: | 
 |       sock, addr = s.accept() | 
 |       connection_list.append((sock, addr)) | 
 |       print("connection_count: %d" % len(connection_list)) | 
 |  | 
 | Run the python scripts on server and client. | 
 |  | 
 | On server:: | 
 |  | 
 |   python3 server_orphan.py | 
 |  | 
 | On client:: | 
 |  | 
 |   python3 client_orphan.py | 
 |  | 
 | Run iptables on server:: | 
 |  | 
 |   sudo iptables -A INPUT -i ens3 -p tcp --destination-port 9000 -j DROP | 
 |  | 
 | Type Ctrl-C on client, stop client_orphan.py. | 
 |  | 
 | Check TcpExtTCPAbortOnMemory on client:: | 
 |  | 
 |   nstatuser@nstat-a:~$ nstat | grep -i abort | 
 |   TcpExtTCPAbortOnMemory          54                 0.0 | 
 |  | 
 | Check orphane socket count on client:: | 
 |  | 
 |   nstatuser@nstat-a:~$ ss -s | 
 |   Total: 131 (kernel 0) | 
 |   TCP:   14 (estab 1, closed 0, orphaned 10, synrecv 0, timewait 0/0), ports 0 | 
 |  | 
 |   Transport Total     IP        IPv6 | 
 |   *         0         -         - | 
 |   RAW       1         0         1 | 
 |   UDP       1         1         0 | 
 |   TCP       14        13        1 | 
 |   INET      16        14        2 | 
 |   FRAG      0         0         0 | 
 |  | 
 | The explanation of the test: after run server_orphan.py and | 
 | client_orphan.py, we set up 64 connections between server and | 
 | client. Run the iptables command, the server will drop all packets from | 
 | the client, type Ctrl-C on client_orphan.py, the system of the client | 
 | would try to close these connections, and before they are closed | 
 | gracefully, these connections became orphan sockets. As the iptables | 
 | of the server blocked packets from the client, the server won't receive fin | 
 | from the client, so all connection on clients would be stuck on FIN_WAIT_1 | 
 | stage, so they will keep as orphan sockets until timeout. We have echo | 
 | 10 to /proc/sys/net/ipv4/tcp_max_orphans, so the client system would | 
 | only keep 10 orphan sockets, for all other orphan sockets, the client | 
 | system sent RST for them and delete them. We have 64 connections, so | 
 | the 'ss -s' command shows the system has 10 orphan sockets, and the | 
 | value of TcpExtTCPAbortOnMemory was 54. | 
 |  | 
 | An additional explanation about orphan socket count: You could find the | 
 | exactly orphan socket count by the 'ss -s' command, but when kernel | 
 | decide whither increases TcpExtTCPAbortOnMemory and sends RST, kernel | 
 | doesn't always check the exactly orphan socket count. For increasing | 
 | performance, kernel checks an approximate count firstly, if the | 
 | approximate count is more than tcp_max_orphans, kernel checks the | 
 | exact count again. So if the approximate count is less than | 
 | tcp_max_orphans, but exactly count is more than tcp_max_orphans, you | 
 | would find TcpExtTCPAbortOnMemory is not increased at all. If | 
 | tcp_max_orphans is large enough, it won't occur, but if you decrease | 
 | tcp_max_orphans to a small value like our test, you might find this | 
 | issue. So in our test, the client set up 64 connections although the | 
 | tcp_max_orphans is 10. If the client only set up 11 connections, we | 
 | can't find the change of TcpExtTCPAbortOnMemory. | 
 |  | 
 | Continue the previous test, we wait for several minutes. Because of the | 
 | iptables on the server blocked the traffic, the server wouldn't receive | 
 | fin, and all the client's orphan sockets would timeout on the | 
 | FIN_WAIT_1 state finally. So we wait for a few minutes, we could find | 
 | 10 timeout on the client:: | 
 |  | 
 |   nstatuser@nstat-a:~$ nstat | grep -i abort | 
 |   TcpExtTCPAbortOnTimeout         10                 0.0 | 
 |  | 
 | TcpExtTCPAbortOnLinger | 
 | ---------------------- | 
 | The server side code:: | 
 |  | 
 |   nstatuser@nstat-b:~$ cat server_linger.py | 
 |   import socket | 
 |   import time | 
 |  | 
 |   port = 9000 | 
 |  | 
 |   s = socket.socket(socket.AF_INET, socket.SOCK_STREAM) | 
 |   s.bind(('0.0.0.0', port)) | 
 |   s.listen(1) | 
 |   sock, addr = s.accept() | 
 |   while True: | 
 |       time.sleep(9999999) | 
 |  | 
 | The client side code:: | 
 |  | 
 |   nstatuser@nstat-a:~$ cat client_linger.py | 
 |   import socket | 
 |   import struct | 
 |  | 
 |   server = 'nstat-b' # server address | 
 |   port = 9000 | 
 |  | 
 |   s = socket.socket(socket.AF_INET, socket.SOCK_STREAM) | 
 |   s.setsockopt(socket.SOL_SOCKET, socket.SO_LINGER, struct.pack('ii', 1, 10)) | 
 |   s.setsockopt(socket.SOL_TCP, socket.TCP_LINGER2, struct.pack('i', -1)) | 
 |   s.connect((server, port)) | 
 |   s.close() | 
 |  | 
 | Run server_linger.py on server:: | 
 |  | 
 |   nstatuser@nstat-b:~$ python3 server_linger.py | 
 |  | 
 | Run client_linger.py on client:: | 
 |  | 
 |   nstatuser@nstat-a:~$ python3 client_linger.py | 
 |  | 
 | After run client_linger.py, check the output of nstat:: | 
 |  | 
 |   nstatuser@nstat-a:~$ nstat | grep -i abort | 
 |   TcpExtTCPAbortOnLinger          1                  0.0 | 
 |  | 
 | TcpExtTCPRcvCoalesce | 
 | -------------------- | 
 | On the server, we run a program which listen on TCP port 9000, but | 
 | doesn't read any data:: | 
 |  | 
 |   import socket | 
 |   import time | 
 |   port = 9000 | 
 |   s = socket.socket(socket.AF_INET, socket.SOCK_STREAM) | 
 |   s.bind(('0.0.0.0', port)) | 
 |   s.listen(1) | 
 |   sock, addr = s.accept() | 
 |   while True: | 
 |       time.sleep(9999999) | 
 |  | 
 | Save the above code as server_coalesce.py, and run:: | 
 |  | 
 |   python3 server_coalesce.py | 
 |  | 
 | On the client, save below code as client_coalesce.py:: | 
 |  | 
 |   import socket | 
 |   server = 'nstat-b' | 
 |   port = 9000 | 
 |   s = socket.socket(socket.AF_INET, socket.SOCK_STREAM) | 
 |   s.connect((server, port)) | 
 |  | 
 | Run:: | 
 |  | 
 |   nstatuser@nstat-a:~$ python3 -i client_coalesce.py | 
 |  | 
 | We use '-i' to come into the interactive mode, then a packet:: | 
 |  | 
 |   >>> s.send(b'foo') | 
 |   3 | 
 |  | 
 | Send a packet again:: | 
 |  | 
 |   >>> s.send(b'bar') | 
 |   3 | 
 |  | 
 | On the server, run nstat:: | 
 |  | 
 |   ubuntu@nstat-b:~$ nstat | 
 |   #kernel | 
 |   IpInReceives                    2                  0.0 | 
 |   IpInDelivers                    2                  0.0 | 
 |   IpOutRequests                   2                  0.0 | 
 |   TcpInSegs                       2                  0.0 | 
 |   TcpOutSegs                      2                  0.0 | 
 |   TcpExtTCPRcvCoalesce            1                  0.0 | 
 |   IpExtInOctets                   110                0.0 | 
 |   IpExtOutOctets                  104                0.0 | 
 |   IpExtInNoECTPkts                2                  0.0 | 
 |  | 
 | The client sent two packets, server didn't read any data. When | 
 | the second packet arrived at server, the first packet was still in | 
 | the receiving queue. So the TCP layer merged the two packets, and we | 
 | could find the TcpExtTCPRcvCoalesce increased 1. | 
 |  | 
 | TcpExtListenOverflows and TcpExtListenDrops | 
 | ------------------------------------------- | 
 | On server, run the nc command, listen on port 9000:: | 
 |  | 
 |   nstatuser@nstat-b:~$ nc -lkv 0.0.0.0 9000 | 
 |   Listening on [0.0.0.0] (family 0, port 9000) | 
 |  | 
 | On client, run 3 nc commands in different terminals:: | 
 |  | 
 |   nstatuser@nstat-a:~$ nc -v nstat-b 9000 | 
 |   Connection to nstat-b 9000 port [tcp/*] succeeded! | 
 |  | 
 | The nc command only accepts 1 connection, and the accept queue length | 
 | is 1. On current linux implementation, set queue length to n means the | 
 | actual queue length is n+1. Now we create 3 connections, 1 is accepted | 
 | by nc, 2 in accepted queue, so the accept queue is full. | 
 |  | 
 | Before running the 4th nc, we clean the nstat history on the server:: | 
 |  | 
 |   nstatuser@nstat-b:~$ nstat -n | 
 |  | 
 | Run the 4th nc on the client:: | 
 |  | 
 |   nstatuser@nstat-a:~$ nc -v nstat-b 9000 | 
 |  | 
 | If the nc server is running on kernel 4.10 or higher version, you | 
 | won't see the "Connection to ... succeeded!" string, because kernel | 
 | will drop the SYN if the accept queue is full. If the nc client is running | 
 | on an old kernel, you would see that the connection is succeeded, | 
 | because kernel would complete the 3 way handshake and keep the socket | 
 | on half open queue. I did the test on kernel 4.15. Below is the nstat | 
 | on the server:: | 
 |  | 
 |   nstatuser@nstat-b:~$ nstat | 
 |   #kernel | 
 |   IpInReceives                    4                  0.0 | 
 |   IpInDelivers                    4                  0.0 | 
 |   TcpInSegs                       4                  0.0 | 
 |   TcpExtListenOverflows           4                  0.0 | 
 |   TcpExtListenDrops               4                  0.0 | 
 |   IpExtInOctets                   240                0.0 | 
 |   IpExtInNoECTPkts                4                  0.0 | 
 |  | 
 | Both TcpExtListenOverflows and TcpExtListenDrops were 4. If the time | 
 | between the 4th nc and the nstat was longer, the value of | 
 | TcpExtListenOverflows and TcpExtListenDrops would be larger, because | 
 | the SYN of the 4th nc was dropped, the client was retrying. | 
 |  | 
 | IpInAddrErrors, IpExtInNoRoutes and IpOutNoRoutes | 
 | ------------------------------------------------- | 
 | server A IP address: 192.168.122.250 | 
 | server B IP address: 192.168.122.251 | 
 | Prepare on server A, add a route to server B:: | 
 |  | 
 |   $ sudo ip route add 8.8.8.8/32 via 192.168.122.251 | 
 |  | 
 | Prepare on server B, disable send_redirects for all interfaces:: | 
 |  | 
 |   $ sudo sysctl -w net.ipv4.conf.all.send_redirects=0 | 
 |   $ sudo sysctl -w net.ipv4.conf.ens3.send_redirects=0 | 
 |   $ sudo sysctl -w net.ipv4.conf.lo.send_redirects=0 | 
 |   $ sudo sysctl -w net.ipv4.conf.default.send_redirects=0 | 
 |  | 
 | We want to let sever A send a packet to 8.8.8.8, and route the packet | 
 | to server B. When server B receives such packet, it might send a ICMP | 
 | Redirect message to server A, set send_redirects to 0 will disable | 
 | this behavior. | 
 |  | 
 | First, generate InAddrErrors. On server B, we disable IP forwarding:: | 
 |  | 
 |   $ sudo sysctl -w net.ipv4.conf.all.forwarding=0 | 
 |  | 
 | On server A, we send packets to 8.8.8.8:: | 
 |  | 
 |   $ nc -v 8.8.8.8 53 | 
 |  | 
 | On server B, we check the output of nstat:: | 
 |  | 
 |   $ nstat | 
 |   #kernel | 
 |   IpInReceives                    3                  0.0 | 
 |   IpInAddrErrors                  3                  0.0 | 
 |   IpExtInOctets                   180                0.0 | 
 |   IpExtInNoECTPkts                3                  0.0 | 
 |  | 
 | As we have let server A route 8.8.8.8 to server B, and we disabled IP | 
 | forwarding on server B, Server A sent packets to server B, then server B | 
 | dropped packets and increased IpInAddrErrors. As the nc command would | 
 | re-send the SYN packet if it didn't receive a SYN+ACK, we could find | 
 | multiple IpInAddrErrors. | 
 |  | 
 | Second, generate IpExtInNoRoutes. On server B, we enable IP | 
 | forwarding:: | 
 |  | 
 |   $ sudo sysctl -w net.ipv4.conf.all.forwarding=1 | 
 |  | 
 | Check the route table of server B and remove the default route:: | 
 |  | 
 |   $ ip route show | 
 |   default via 192.168.122.1 dev ens3 proto static | 
 |   192.168.122.0/24 dev ens3 proto kernel scope link src 192.168.122.251 | 
 |   $ sudo ip route delete default via 192.168.122.1 dev ens3 proto static | 
 |  | 
 | On server A, we contact 8.8.8.8 again:: | 
 |  | 
 |   $ nc -v 8.8.8.8 53 | 
 |   nc: connect to 8.8.8.8 port 53 (tcp) failed: Network is unreachable | 
 |  | 
 | On server B, run nstat:: | 
 |  | 
 |   $ nstat | 
 |   #kernel | 
 |   IpInReceives                    1                  0.0 | 
 |   IpOutRequests                   1                  0.0 | 
 |   IcmpOutMsgs                     1                  0.0 | 
 |   IcmpOutDestUnreachs             1                  0.0 | 
 |   IcmpMsgOutType3                 1                  0.0 | 
 |   IpExtInNoRoutes                 1                  0.0 | 
 |   IpExtInOctets                   60                 0.0 | 
 |   IpExtOutOctets                  88                 0.0 | 
 |   IpExtInNoECTPkts                1                  0.0 | 
 |  | 
 | We enabled IP forwarding on server B, when server B received a packet | 
 | which destination IP address is 8.8.8.8, server B will try to forward | 
 | this packet. We have deleted the default route, there was no route for | 
 | 8.8.8.8, so server B increase IpExtInNoRoutes and sent the "ICMP | 
 | Destination Unreachable" message to server A. | 
 |  | 
 | Third, generate IpOutNoRoutes. Run ping command on server B:: | 
 |  | 
 |   $ ping -c 1 8.8.8.8 | 
 |   connect: Network is unreachable | 
 |  | 
 | Run nstat on server B:: | 
 |  | 
 |   $ nstat | 
 |   #kernel | 
 |   IpOutNoRoutes                   1                  0.0 | 
 |  | 
 | We have deleted the default route on server B. Server B couldn't find | 
 | a route for the 8.8.8.8 IP address, so server B increased | 
 | IpOutNoRoutes. | 
 |  | 
 | TcpExtTCPACKSkippedSynRecv | 
 | -------------------------- | 
 | In this test, we send 3 same SYN packets from client to server. The | 
 | first SYN will let server create a socket, set it to Syn-Recv status, | 
 | and reply a SYN/ACK. The second SYN will let server reply the SYN/ACK | 
 | again, and record the reply time (the duplicate ACK reply time). The | 
 | third SYN will let server check the previous duplicate ACK reply time, | 
 | and decide to skip the duplicate ACK, then increase the | 
 | TcpExtTCPACKSkippedSynRecv counter. | 
 |  | 
 | Run tcpdump to capture a SYN packet:: | 
 |  | 
 |   nstatuser@nstat-a:~$ sudo tcpdump -c 1 -w /tmp/syn.pcap port 9000 | 
 |   tcpdump: listening on ens3, link-type EN10MB (Ethernet), capture size 262144 bytes | 
 |  | 
 | Open another terminal, run nc command:: | 
 |  | 
 |   nstatuser@nstat-a:~$ nc nstat-b 9000 | 
 |  | 
 | As the nstat-b didn't listen on port 9000, it should reply a RST, and | 
 | the nc command exited immediately. It was enough for the tcpdump | 
 | command to capture a SYN packet. A linux server might use hardware | 
 | offload for the TCP checksum, so the checksum in the /tmp/syn.pcap | 
 | might be not correct. We call tcprewrite to fix it:: | 
 |  | 
 |   nstatuser@nstat-a:~$ tcprewrite --infile=/tmp/syn.pcap --outfile=/tmp/syn_fixcsum.pcap --fixcsum | 
 |  | 
 | On nstat-b, we run nc to listen on port 9000:: | 
 |  | 
 |   nstatuser@nstat-b:~$ nc -lkv 9000 | 
 |   Listening on [0.0.0.0] (family 0, port 9000) | 
 |  | 
 | On nstat-a, we blocked the packet from port 9000, or nstat-a would send | 
 | RST to nstat-b:: | 
 |  | 
 |   nstatuser@nstat-a:~$ sudo iptables -A INPUT -p tcp --sport 9000 -j DROP | 
 |  | 
 | Send 3 SYN repeatly to nstat-b:: | 
 |  | 
 |   nstatuser@nstat-a:~$ for i in {1..3}; do sudo tcpreplay -i ens3 /tmp/syn_fixcsum.pcap; done | 
 |  | 
 | Check snmp cunter on nstat-b:: | 
 |  | 
 |   nstatuser@nstat-b:~$ nstat | grep -i skip | 
 |   TcpExtTCPACKSkippedSynRecv      1                  0.0 | 
 |  | 
 | As we expected, TcpExtTCPACKSkippedSynRecv is 1. | 
 |  | 
 | TcpExtTCPACKSkippedPAWS | 
 | ----------------------- | 
 | To trigger PAWS, we could send an old SYN. | 
 |  | 
 | On nstat-b, let nc listen on port 9000:: | 
 |  | 
 |   nstatuser@nstat-b:~$ nc -lkv 9000 | 
 |   Listening on [0.0.0.0] (family 0, port 9000) | 
 |  | 
 | On nstat-a, run tcpdump to capture a SYN:: | 
 |  | 
 |   nstatuser@nstat-a:~$ sudo tcpdump -w /tmp/paws_pre.pcap -c 1 port 9000 | 
 |   tcpdump: listening on ens3, link-type EN10MB (Ethernet), capture size 262144 bytes | 
 |  | 
 | On nstat-a, run nc as a client to connect nstat-b:: | 
 |  | 
 |   nstatuser@nstat-a:~$ nc -v nstat-b 9000 | 
 |   Connection to nstat-b 9000 port [tcp/*] succeeded! | 
 |  | 
 | Now the tcpdump has captured the SYN and exit. We should fix the | 
 | checksum:: | 
 |  | 
 |   nstatuser@nstat-a:~$ tcprewrite --infile /tmp/paws_pre.pcap --outfile /tmp/paws.pcap --fixcsum | 
 |  | 
 | Send the SYN packet twice:: | 
 |  | 
 |   nstatuser@nstat-a:~$ for i in {1..2}; do sudo tcpreplay -i ens3 /tmp/paws.pcap; done | 
 |  | 
 | On nstat-b, check the snmp counter:: | 
 |  | 
 |   nstatuser@nstat-b:~$ nstat | grep -i skip | 
 |   TcpExtTCPACKSkippedPAWS         1                  0.0 | 
 |  | 
 | We sent two SYN via tcpreplay, both of them would let PAWS check | 
 | failed, the nstat-b replied an ACK for the first SYN, skipped the ACK | 
 | for the second SYN, and updated TcpExtTCPACKSkippedPAWS. | 
 |  | 
 | TcpExtTCPACKSkippedSeq | 
 | ---------------------- | 
 | To trigger TcpExtTCPACKSkippedSeq, we send packets which have valid | 
 | timestamp (to pass PAWS check) but the sequence number is out of | 
 | window. The linux TCP stack would avoid to skip if the packet has | 
 | data, so we need a pure ACK packet. To generate such a packet, we | 
 | could create two sockets: one on port 9000, another on port 9001. Then | 
 | we capture an ACK on port 9001, change the source/destination port | 
 | numbers to match the port 9000 socket. Then we could trigger | 
 | TcpExtTCPACKSkippedSeq via this packet. | 
 |  | 
 | On nstat-b, open two terminals, run two nc commands to listen on both | 
 | port 9000 and port 9001:: | 
 |  | 
 |   nstatuser@nstat-b:~$ nc -lkv 9000 | 
 |   Listening on [0.0.0.0] (family 0, port 9000) | 
 |  | 
 |   nstatuser@nstat-b:~$ nc -lkv 9001 | 
 |   Listening on [0.0.0.0] (family 0, port 9001) | 
 |  | 
 | On nstat-a, run two nc clients:: | 
 |  | 
 |   nstatuser@nstat-a:~$ nc -v nstat-b 9000 | 
 |   Connection to nstat-b 9000 port [tcp/*] succeeded! | 
 |  | 
 |   nstatuser@nstat-a:~$ nc -v nstat-b 9001 | 
 |   Connection to nstat-b 9001 port [tcp/*] succeeded! | 
 |  | 
 | On nstat-a, run tcpdump to capture an ACK:: | 
 |  | 
 |   nstatuser@nstat-a:~$ sudo tcpdump -w /tmp/seq_pre.pcap -c 1 dst port 9001 | 
 |   tcpdump: listening on ens3, link-type EN10MB (Ethernet), capture size 262144 bytes | 
 |  | 
 | On nstat-b, send a packet via the port 9001 socket. E.g. we sent a | 
 | string 'foo' in our example:: | 
 |  | 
 |   nstatuser@nstat-b:~$ nc -lkv 9001 | 
 |   Listening on [0.0.0.0] (family 0, port 9001) | 
 |   Connection from nstat-a 42132 received! | 
 |   foo | 
 |  | 
 | On nstat-a, the tcpdump should have caputred the ACK. We should check | 
 | the source port numbers of the two nc clients:: | 
 |  | 
 |   nstatuser@nstat-a:~$ ss -ta '( dport = :9000 || dport = :9001 )' | tee | 
 |   State  Recv-Q   Send-Q         Local Address:Port           Peer Address:Port | 
 |   ESTAB  0        0            192.168.122.250:50208       192.168.122.251:9000 | 
 |   ESTAB  0        0            192.168.122.250:42132       192.168.122.251:9001 | 
 |  | 
 | Run tcprewrite, change port 9001 to port 9000, chagne port 42132 to | 
 | port 50208:: | 
 |  | 
 |   nstatuser@nstat-a:~$ tcprewrite --infile /tmp/seq_pre.pcap --outfile /tmp/seq.pcap -r 9001:9000 -r 42132:50208 --fixcsum | 
 |  | 
 | Now the /tmp/seq.pcap is the packet we need. Send it to nstat-b:: | 
 |  | 
 |   nstatuser@nstat-a:~$ for i in {1..2}; do sudo tcpreplay -i ens3 /tmp/seq.pcap; done | 
 |  | 
 | Check TcpExtTCPACKSkippedSeq on nstat-b:: | 
 |  | 
 |   nstatuser@nstat-b:~$ nstat | grep -i skip | 
 |   TcpExtTCPACKSkippedSeq          1                  0.0 |